Ignore non-displayable fields for indent during writing #851
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ing the writing of BibEntries any more
koppor
added
the
status: ready-for-review
|
Long term fix would be to not indent at all, and just write |
|
The indent has been agreed upon during the discussion at #116 and it seems to be liked by users as there was a question regarding it on tex.stackexchange. No indent would us bring closer to original bibtex format, but away from the biblatex format. Example from page 32 of biblatex's manual:
(:+1: for devall) |
|
Decision: Do not merge. Do the long term fix described at #574 (comment). |
koppor
removed
the
status: ready-for-review
|
Refs #1043 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #834