Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add coveralls badge #368

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 9, 2015
Merged

Conversation

bruderstein
Copy link
Collaborator

This adds a coverage badge to the readme, integrating coveralls.io.

The badge links and API key need changing if this gets the thumbs up, which I think I can do. You can see the result at bruderstein/react-select

I've been testing it out with my repo and keys, hence the need to update the keys & links, but I didn't want to sign up to coveralls without the 👍

The downside is it adds a devDependency (coveralls) that is only really needed for travis.

@JedWatson
Copy link
Owner

We've already got some heavy dev dependencies for the build process, this doesn't look like it would add much more so I'm happy to put it in there. Worth wearing that badge with pride :)

👍 let me know when it's ready to merge.

Travis does an npm install automatically, so removed
this and replaced it with a npm run coveralls, which
runs the tests and submits the coverage to coveralls.

This commit still references bruderstein/react-select,
this needs to be changed before merging
@bruderstein bruderstein force-pushed the add-coveralls-badge branch from 7ca9e73 to 97faa97 Compare August 9, 2015 13:45
@bruderstein
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Good to go 👍

@bruderstein bruderstein changed the title Add coveralls badge [do not merge] Add coveralls badge Aug 9, 2015
JedWatson added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2015
@JedWatson JedWatson merged commit 1960e6f into JedWatson:master Aug 9, 2015
@JedWatson
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants