Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix in(x, ::RectDiagonal) #137

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021
Merged

Fix in(x, ::RectDiagonal) #137

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

jishnub
Copy link
Member

@jishnub jishnub commented Feb 12, 2021

The implementation of in(x, ::RectDiagonal) in #136 was buggy, this PR attempts to improve it.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #137 (cedc431) into master (358e948) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #137      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.55%   95.57%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         517      520       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          494      497       +3     
  Misses         23       23              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/FillArrays.jl 94.23% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 358e948...eb427c1. Read the comment docs.

@jishnub
Copy link
Member Author

jishnub commented Feb 12, 2021

The Appveyor build might need to be disabled for this package on their website, now that appveyor.yml has been deleted

@dlfivefifty
Copy link
Member

Hmm I can't seem to be able to disable...

@dlfivefifty dlfivefifty merged commit 708b830 into JuliaArrays:master Feb 16, 2021
@jishnub jishnub deleted the infix branch February 16, 2021 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants