Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linux: increase the timeout for the "net" (Pkg and friends) tests #332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

Ref #320

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member Author

cc: @vtjnash

Ref #320

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member Author

@staticfloat Any idea why some of the Windows jobs are failing on this PR?

@staticfloat
Copy link
Member

No, looks like a Documenter error. @mortenpi

@mortenpi
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that's a failure in doc/make.jl, and might have to do something with path handling. But it seems to work fine on master? https://buildkite.com/julialang/julia-master/builds/32905#018d5bbd-3469-4972-aa89-0dfaf544c5b4/22353-22445

@staticfloat
Copy link
Member

My guess is it’s not happy with how this repository is a different git repo?

@mortenpi
Copy link
Contributor

My guess is it’s not happy with how this repository is a different git repo?

Yea, this seems plausible. I see that there's a difference in the third git clone that I can see in the logs. In this repo:

git clone -v --dissociate --reference C:\\cache\\repos\\https---github-com-JuliaCI-julia-buildkite-git -- https://github.com/JuliaCI/julia-buildkite.git .

vs

git clone -v --dissociate --reference C:\\cache\\repos\\https---github-com-JuliaLang-julia-git -- https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia.git .

But where is the Julia source code coming from in the former case?

@KristofferC
Copy link
Contributor

Can this be merged anyway to allow for JuliaLang/julia#53125 to be unblocked.

@staticfloat staticfloat merged commit 5a70d9b into main Jan 31, 2024
2 of 6 checks passed
@staticfloat staticfloat deleted the dpa/pkg-timeout branch January 31, 2024 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants