Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't treat Q's like easily readable arrays #725

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 1, 2022
Merged

Don't treat Q's like easily readable arrays #725

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 1, 2022

Conversation

dkarrasch
Copy link
Contributor

This came up in a nanosoldier run in JuliaLang/julia#46196. Independently from that PR, this usage of revert here is supposedly really slow, because there's no quick getindex for qr(A).Qs. I added calls to Matrix, which may yield rectangular matrices in the tall case. I'll propose another solution below if you insist on the square representation.

src/analysis.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/analysis.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Daniel Karrasch <daniel.karrasch@posteo.de>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #725 (5416348) into master (f5e0887) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #725   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.46%   91.46%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        3877     3877           
=======================================
  Hits         3546     3546           
  Misses        331      331           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/analysis.jl 96.32% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f5e0887...5416348. Read the comment docs.

@baggepinnen baggepinnen merged commit a60f302 into JuliaControl:master Aug 1, 2022
@baggepinnen
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the fix :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants