Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DataAPI.unwrap with default definition #35

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2021
Merged

Add DataAPI.unwrap with default definition #35

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2021

Conversation

quinnj
Copy link
Member

@quinnj quinnj commented Feb 14, 2021

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #35 (8523716) into main (4d8facd) will increase coverage by 0.39%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #35      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.90%   91.30%   +0.39%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines          22       23       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits           20       21       +1     
  Misses          2        2              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/DataAPI.jl 91.30% <100.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4d8facd...a4576dc. Read the comment docs.

@bkamins
Copy link
Member

bkamins commented Feb 14, 2021

Thank you. Could you also bump a version of DataAPI.jl so that we could register it after merging? Thank you.

@@ -85,4 +85,9 @@ end

end

@testset "unwrap" begin
@test DataAPI.unwrap(1) === 1
@test DataAPI.unwrap(missing) === missing
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, clever: with that fallback we don't need to use passmissing(unwrap)!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes!

Copy link
Member

@nalimilan nalimilan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@quinnj quinnj merged commit c46688c into main Feb 14, 2021
@quinnj quinnj deleted the jq/unwrap branch February 14, 2021 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants