Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add cols to describe #2020
add cols to describe #2020
Changes from 1 commit
8ddf581
5e42967
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we just drop this (in another PR)? Clearly if you pass
io
you expect the result to be printed there, so it's actively misleading not to throw an error. Or the method takingio
should callshow(io, describe(...))
.Anyway when moving things from StatsBase to Statistics I'd like to change that API so that
describe
always returns a special object that can be printed, instead of printing the result directly. That's more useful and more standard.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
100% agreed in all you write - passing
io
made no sense to me here, but it was defined in DataAPI.jl and I did not want to make breaking changes in this PR.So - after merging this PR do we make another PR that deprecates
io
? (this is what I would do in DataFrames.jl; all other actions are needed in other packages, but they can be done independently, as we clearly document howdescribe
withAbstractDataFrame
works).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I think we can start changing this in DataFrames, the StatsBase to Statistics move will take longer.