Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add skipmissings #111
Add skipmissings #111
Changes from all commits
f235617
f115e46
8c874e8
beab796
6edb38a
2d3cb69
4b20194
70637ea
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this was incorrect before and tests didn't spot it? Probably there was no test with an input large enough to use this branch (IIRC 16 elements is the threshold). Can you add one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added a test for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, thinking about it again, shouldn't this be just
Float64
? The result cannot bemissing
by definition, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the
skipmissing
in Base we haveI don't know why the output works like that given
eltype(sx) == Int
but it's a yet-to-be improved aspect ofmapreduce
withskipmissing
. So it's fair thatskipmissings
would work the same. You have a comment on some issue highlighting that it's not a high priority performance issue but I can't find it.Thankfully small unions are fast.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I need to investigate this. It's somewhat ironic that the function designed to skip missings isn't inferred as such. :-D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually I've realized
@static if
works here instead of@eval
. I've committed that.