This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Mark package as unmaintained #111
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you please add a badge from repostatus.org? Probably unsupported (I would add the markdown code, but I'm on my phone and it's hard to copy the long string
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unsupported gives me kinda the wrong vibe. I'd think either
Inactive
orAbandoned
are more accurate. I thinkAbandoned
is maybe the most correct and useful since it signals that if someone wanted, they could try and take it over, but it also sounds kinda harsh.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, after reading the description,
Unsupported
does seem like the right descriptor.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Abandoned:
Unsupported:
So the latter seems appropriate, by their definition ?
Agreed that the adjective itself does not convey the idea that it would be very cool if someone stepped in.
I'd say the badge + a quote of the definition at the top should be fine though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Considering there are quite a lot of egregious bugs that seriously impact usability, I'd say this package is more abandoned than unsupported.