Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Worth adding some subset of stdlib Logging? #536

Closed
jgoldfar opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Worth adding some subset of stdlib Logging? #536

jgoldfar opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@jgoldfar
Copy link

A more refined version of (e.g.)

macro info(s)
    :(info($s))
end

would make it easier to write code that works on v0.6 and v0.7/1.0, or would the recommendation be to import MicroLogging or some other framework on v0.6?

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

Compat.@info etc works on both 0.6 and 0.7 (#458).

@jgoldfar
Copy link
Author

Ah; right you are. I never think to check for unexported functionality from Compat...

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

I never think to check for unexported functionality from Compat...

All implemented functionality should be listed in Compats README.

@jgoldfar
Copy link
Author

jgoldfar commented Apr 24, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants