Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

avoid division by zero in svd(::Diagonal) #1150

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

araujoms
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1149

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (1137b4c) to head (bb5f566).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1150      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.81%   91.85%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines       15342    15342              
==========================================
+ Hits        14087    14092       +5     
+ Misses       1255     1250       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jd-foster
Copy link
Collaborator

Would it be possible to add a test for this as well?

@araujoms
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure.

@@ -463,7 +463,8 @@ Random.seed!(1)
end
end

@testset "svd (#11120/#11247)" begin
@testset "svd (#11120/#11247/#1149)" begin
D[1] = 0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this changing D for all the tests coming after this? I see that tests pass, but perhaps it's better to introduce a small new testset with the example you gave in the original issue:

d = [1, 2, 3, 4, 0]
@test svd(diagm(d)) == svd(Diagonal(d))

?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, it is. That was intentional, as the subsequent test was also failing for singular matrices. I thought about doing that when D is generated in the first place, as a zero is more useful test than a random number, but decided against because that would be confusing.

I don't have anything to do with issue, though, I just randomly found it and decided to fix it because it was so easy.

@jishnub
Copy link
Collaborator

jishnub commented Dec 21, 2024

Looks fine to me, so barring further comments, I would suggest merging.

@jishnub jishnub merged commit 7c0ecd6 into JuliaLang:master Dec 22, 2024
4 checks passed
@araujoms araujoms deleted the patch-1 branch December 22, 2024 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NaN values in SVD of zero matrix wrapped in Diagonal
4 participants