-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Refactor scalar range getindex (#50467)
- Loading branch information
1 parent
fb76136
commit 6f026e3
Showing
4 changed files
with
31 additions
and
49 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6f026e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nanosoldier
runbenchmarks("array", vs="@fb7613635cab77cf269790335e8121f513c9ea96")
6f026e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here.
6f026e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LilithHafner it seems maybe the removal of inbounds was a bit costly on some benchmarks. Could you see if those are real regressions, and if we should do something about them?
6f026e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it was the removal of inline, not inbounds; I can verify that at least some of them are real; and yes, should be an easy fix. Thanks for @ ing me.
6f026e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#51160