Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
post-opt analysis: fix conditional successor visitation logic (#53518)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Previously `conditional_successors_may_throw` performed post-domination
analysis not on the initially specified `bb` (which was given as the
argument), but on those BBs being analyzed that were popped from the
work-queue at the time. As a result, there were cases where not all
conditional successors were visited.

fixes #53508
  • Loading branch information
aviatesk committed Mar 1, 2024
1 parent 7ef180e commit d6bbf85
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 48 additions and 7 deletions.
21 changes: 14 additions & 7 deletions base/compiler/optimize.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -534,17 +534,22 @@ function any_stmt_may_throw(ir::IRCode, bb::Int)
return false
end

function conditional_successors_may_throw(lazypostdomtree::LazyPostDomtree, ir::IRCode, bb::Int)
function visit_conditional_successors(callback, lazypostdomtree::LazyPostDomtree, ir::IRCode, bb::Int)
visited = BitSet((bb,))
worklist = Int[bb]
while !isempty(worklist)
thisbb = pop!(worklist)
thisbb = popfirst!(worklist)
for succ in ir.cfg.blocks[thisbb].succs
succ in visited && continue
push!(visited, succ)
postdominates(get!(lazypostdomtree), succ, thisbb) && continue
any_stmt_may_throw(ir, succ) && return true
push!(worklist, succ)
if postdominates(get!(lazypostdomtree), succ, bb)
# this successor is not conditional, so no need to visit it further
continue
elseif callback(succ)
return true
else
push!(worklist, succ)
end
end
end
return false
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -836,8 +841,10 @@ function ((; sv)::ScanStmt)(inst::Instruction, lstmt::Int, bb::Int)
# inconsistent region.
if !sv.result.ipo_effects.terminates
sv.all_retpaths_consistent = false
elseif conditional_successors_may_throw(sv.lazypostdomtree, sv.ir, bb)
# Check if there are potential throws that require
elseif visit_conditional_successors(sv.lazypostdomtree, sv.ir, bb) do succ::Int
return any_stmt_may_throw(sv.ir, succ)
end
# check if this `GotoIfNot` leads to conditional throws, which taints consistency
sv.all_retpaths_consistent = false
else
(; cfg, domtree) = get!(sv.lazyagdomtree)
Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions test/compiler/effects.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1382,3 +1382,8 @@ let; Base.Experimental.@force_compile; func52843(); end
# pointerref nothrow for invalid pointer
@test !Core.Compiler.intrinsic_nothrow(Core.Intrinsics.pointerref, Any[Type{Ptr{Vector{Int64}}}, Int, Int])
@test !Core.Compiler.intrinsic_nothrow(Core.Intrinsics.pointerref, Any[Type{Ptr{T}} where T, Int, Int])

# post-opt :consistent-cy analysis correctness
# https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/53508
@test !Core.Compiler.is_consistent(Base.infer_effects(getindex, (UnitRange{Int},Int)))
@test !Core.Compiler.is_consistent(Base.infer_effects(getindex, (Base.OneTo{Int},Int)))
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions test/compiler/ssair.jl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -238,6 +238,35 @@ let ci = code_lowered(()->@isdefined(_not_def_37919_), ())[1]
@test Core.Compiler.verify_ir(ir) === nothing
end

let code = Any[
# block 1
GotoIfNot(Argument(2), 4),
# block 2
GotoNode(3),
# block 3
Expr(:call, throw, "potential throw"),
# block 4
Expr(:call, Core.Intrinsics.add_int, Argument(3), Argument(4)),
GotoNode(6),
# block 5
ReturnNode(SSAValue(4))
]
ir = make_ircode(code; slottypes=Any[Any,Bool,Int,Int])
lazypostdomtree = Core.Compiler.LazyPostDomtree(ir)
visited = BitSet()
@test !Core.Compiler.visit_conditional_successors(lazypostdomtree, ir, #=bb=#1) do succ::Int
push!(visited, succ)
return false
end
@test 2 visited
@test 3 visited
@test 4 visited
@test 5 visited
oc = Core.OpaqueClosure(ir)
@test oc(false, 1, 1) == 2
@test_throws "potential throw" oc(true, 1, 1)
end

# Test dynamic update of domtree with edge insertions and deletions in the
# following CFG:
#
Expand Down

0 comments on commit d6bbf85

Please sign in to comment.