string literals: ASCIIString, UTF8String #4

StefanKarpinski · 2011-04-27T04:31:05Z

See the discussion here. The salient conclusion is this:

Escapes continue to work the way they do now: \x always inserts a single byte and \u always inserts a sequence of bytes encoding a unicode character. Literals are turned into String objects according to the following simple check:

ASCIIString if all bytes are < 0x80;
UTF8String if any bytes are ≥ 0x80.

If you want to use \x escapes with values at or above 0x80 to generate invalid UTF-8, that's your business. We can also introduce an Latin1"..." form that uses the Latin-1 encoding to store code points up to U+FF in an efficient character-per-byte form. Finally, the b"..." macro-defined string form can let you use characters and escapes (both \x and \u) to generate byte arrays.

We can safely and quickly concatenate ASCIIStrings with each other, with UTF8Strings, or with Latin1Strings. Mixing UTF8Strings and Latin1Strings, however, requires transcoding the Latin1Strings to UTF-8. This, however, will not occur with string literals since they will always be ASCIIStrings or UTF8Strings.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Improved do not edit message in helpdb.jl

Rebase to f189271

@benchmark

This is part of the work to address #51352 by attempting to allow the compiler to perform SRAO on persistent data structures like `PersistentDict` as if they were regular immutable data structures. These sorts of data structures have very complicated internals (with lots of mutation, memory sharing, etc.), but a relatively simple interface. As such, it is unlikely that our compiler will have sufficient power to optimize this interface by analyzing the implementation. We thus need to come up with some other mechanism that gives the compiler license to perform the requisite optimization. One way would be to just hardcode `PersistentDict` into the compiler, optimizing it like any of the other builtin datatypes. However, this is of course very unsatisfying. At the other end of the spectrum would be something like a generic rewrite rule system (e-graphs anyone?) that would let the PersistentDict implementation declare its interface to the compiler and the compiler would use this for optimization (in a perfect world, the actual rewrite would then be checked using some sort of formal methods). I think that would be interesting, but we're very far from even being able to design something like that (at least in Base - experiments with external AbstractInterpreters in this direction are encouraged). This PR tries to come up with a reasonable middle ground, where the compiler gets some knowledge of the protocol hardcoded without having to know about the implementation details of the data structure. The basic ideas is that `Core` provides some magic generic functions that implementations can extend. Semantically, they are not special. They dispatch as usual, and implementations are expected to work properly even in the absence of any compiler optimizations. However, the compiler is semantically permitted to perform structural optimization using these magic generic functions. In the concrete case, this PR introduces the `KeyValue` interface which consists of two generic functions, `get` and `set`. The core optimization is that the compiler is allowed to rewrite any occurrence of `get(set(x, k, v), k)` into `v` without additional legality checks. In particular, the compiler performs no type checks, conversions, etc. The higher level implementation code is expected to do all that. This approach closely matches the general direction we've been taking in external AbstractInterpreters for embedding additional semantics and optimization opportunities into Julia code (although we generally use methods there, rather than full generic functions), so I think we have some evidence that this sort of approach works reasonably well. Nevertheless, this is certainly an experiment and the interface is explicitly declared unstable. ## Current Status This is fully working and implemented, but the optimization currently bails on anything but the simplest cases. Filling all those cases in is not particularly hard, but should be done along with a more invasive refactoring of SROA, so we should figure out the general direction here first and then we can finish all that up in a follow-up cleanup. ## Obligatory benchmark Before: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 993 evaluations. Range (min … max): 32.940 ns … 28.754 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 99.76% Time (median): 49.647 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 57.519 ns ± 333.275 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 10.81% ± 2.22% ▃█▅ ▁▃▅▅▃▁ ▁▃▂ ▂ ▁▂▄▃▅▇███▇▃▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅██████▅▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▇███▇▆███▆▄▃▃▂▂ ▃ 32.9 ns Histogram: frequency by time 68.6 ns < Memory estimate: 128 bytes, allocs estimate: 4. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ %1 = invoke Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.undef::UndefInitializer, 1::Int64)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %2 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, %1, 0x00000000)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64} │ %3 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}, :a, 1)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64} │ %4 = Base.getfield(%2, :data)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %5 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool └── goto #5 if not %5 2 ─ %7 = Base.sub_int(1, 1)::Int64 │ %8 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %7)::UInt64 │ %9 = Base.getfield(%4, :size)::Tuple{Int64} │ %10 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool │ %11 = Base.getfield(%9, 1, %10)::Int64 │ %12 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %11)::UInt64 │ %13 = Base.ult_int(%8, %12)::Bool └── goto #4 if not %13 3 ─ goto #5 4 ─ %16 = Core.tuple(1)::Tuple{Int64} │ invoke Base.throw_boundserror(%4::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}, %16::Tuple{Int64})::Union{} └── unreachable 5 ┄ %19 = Base.getfield(%4, :ref)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %20 = Base.memoryref(%19, 1, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ Base.memoryrefset!(%20, %3, :not_atomic, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} └── goto #6 6 ─ %23 = Base.getfield(%2, :bitmap)::UInt32 │ %24 = Base.or_int(%23, 0x00010000)::UInt32 │ Base.setfield!(%2, :bitmap, %24)::UInt32 └── goto #7 7 ─ %27 = %new(Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, %2)::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64} └── goto #8 8 ─ %29 = invoke Base.getindex(%27::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, 🅰️:Symbol)::Int64 └── return %29 ``` After: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1000 evaluations. Range (min … max): 2.459 ns … 11.320 ns ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 2.460 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 2.469 ns ± 0.183 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▂ █ ▁ █ ▂ █▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁█ █ 2.46 ns Histogram: log(frequency) by time 2.47 ns < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ return 1 ```

@benchmark

This is part of the work to address #51352 by attempting to allow the compiler to perform SRAO on persistent data structures like `PersistentDict` as if they were regular immutable data structures. These sorts of data structures have very complicated internals (with lots of mutation, memory sharing, etc.), but a relatively simple interface. As such, it is unlikely that our compiler will have sufficient power to optimize this interface by analyzing the implementation. We thus need to come up with some other mechanism that gives the compiler license to perform the requisite optimization. One way would be to just hardcode `PersistentDict` into the compiler, optimizing it like any of the other builtin datatypes. However, this is of course very unsatisfying. At the other end of the spectrum would be something like a generic rewrite rule system (e-graphs anyone?) that would let the PersistentDict implementation declare its interface to the compiler and the compiler would use this for optimization (in a perfect world, the actual rewrite would then be checked using some sort of formal methods). I think that would be interesting, but we're very far from even being able to design something like that (at least in Base - experiments with external AbstractInterpreters in this direction are encouraged). This PR tries to come up with a reasonable middle ground, where the compiler gets some knowledge of the protocol hardcoded without having to know about the implementation details of the data structure. The basic ideas is that `Core` provides some magic generic functions that implementations can extend. Semantically, they are not special. They dispatch as usual, and implementations are expected to work properly even in the absence of any compiler optimizations. However, the compiler is semantically permitted to perform structural optimization using these magic generic functions. In the concrete case, this PR introduces the `KeyValue` interface which consists of two generic functions, `get` and `set`. The core optimization is that the compiler is allowed to rewrite any occurrence of `get(set(x, k, v), k)` into `v` without additional legality checks. In particular, the compiler performs no type checks, conversions, etc. The higher level implementation code is expected to do all that. This approach closely matches the general direction we've been taking in external AbstractInterpreters for embedding additional semantics and optimization opportunities into Julia code (although we generally use methods there, rather than full generic functions), so I think we have some evidence that this sort of approach works reasonably well. Nevertheless, this is certainly an experiment and the interface is explicitly declared unstable. This is fully working and implemented, but the optimization currently bails on anything but the simplest cases. Filling all those cases in is not particularly hard, but should be done along with a more invasive refactoring of SROA, so we should figure out the general direction here first and then we can finish all that up in a follow-up cleanup. Before: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 993 evaluations. Range (min … max): 32.940 ns … 28.754 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 99.76% Time (median): 49.647 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 57.519 ns ± 333.275 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 10.81% ± 2.22% ▃█▅ ▁▃▅▅▃▁ ▁▃▂ ▂ ▁▂▄▃▅▇███▇▃▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅██████▅▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▇███▇▆███▆▄▃▃▂▂ ▃ 32.9 ns Histogram: frequency by time 68.6 ns < Memory estimate: 128 bytes, allocs estimate: 4. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ %1 = invoke Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.undef::UndefInitializer, 1::Int64)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %2 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, %1, 0x00000000)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64} │ %3 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}, :a, 1)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64} │ %4 = Base.getfield(%2, :data)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %5 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool └── goto #5 if not %5 2 ─ %7 = Base.sub_int(1, 1)::Int64 │ %8 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %7)::UInt64 │ %9 = Base.getfield(%4, :size)::Tuple{Int64} │ %10 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool │ %11 = Base.getfield(%9, 1, %10)::Int64 │ %12 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %11)::UInt64 │ %13 = Base.ult_int(%8, %12)::Bool └── goto #4 if not %13 3 ─ goto #5 4 ─ %16 = Core.tuple(1)::Tuple{Int64} │ invoke Base.throw_boundserror(%4::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}, %16::Tuple{Int64})::Union{} └── unreachable 5 ┄ %19 = Base.getfield(%4, :ref)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %20 = Base.memoryref(%19, 1, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ Base.memoryrefset!(%20, %3, :not_atomic, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} └── goto #6 6 ─ %23 = Base.getfield(%2, :bitmap)::UInt32 │ %24 = Base.or_int(%23, 0x00010000)::UInt32 │ Base.setfield!(%2, :bitmap, %24)::UInt32 └── goto #7 7 ─ %27 = %new(Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, %2)::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64} └── goto #8 8 ─ %29 = invoke Base.getindex(%27::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, 🅰️:Symbol)::Int64 └── return %29 ``` After: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1000 evaluations. Range (min … max): 2.459 ns … 11.320 ns ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 2.460 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 2.469 ns ± 0.183 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▂ █ ▁ █ ▂ █▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁█ █ 2.46 ns Histogram: log(frequency) by time 2.47 ns < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ return 1 ```

@benchmark

This is part of the work to address #51352 by attempting to allow the compiler to perform SRAO on persistent data structures like `PersistentDict` as if they were regular immutable data structures. These sorts of data structures have very complicated internals (with lots of mutation, memory sharing, etc.), but a relatively simple interface. As such, it is unlikely that our compiler will have sufficient power to optimize this interface by analyzing the implementation. We thus need to come up with some other mechanism that gives the compiler license to perform the requisite optimization. One way would be to just hardcode `PersistentDict` into the compiler, optimizing it like any of the other builtin datatypes. However, this is of course very unsatisfying. At the other end of the spectrum would be something like a generic rewrite rule system (e-graphs anyone?) that would let the PersistentDict implementation declare its interface to the compiler and the compiler would use this for optimization (in a perfect world, the actual rewrite would then be checked using some sort of formal methods). I think that would be interesting, but we're very far from even being able to design something like that (at least in Base - experiments with external AbstractInterpreters in this direction are encouraged). This PR tries to come up with a reasonable middle ground, where the compiler gets some knowledge of the protocol hardcoded without having to know about the implementation details of the data structure. The basic ideas is that `Core` provides some magic generic functions that implementations can extend. Semantically, they are not special. They dispatch as usual, and implementations are expected to work properly even in the absence of any compiler optimizations. However, the compiler is semantically permitted to perform structural optimization using these magic generic functions. In the concrete case, this PR introduces the `KeyValue` interface which consists of two generic functions, `get` and `set`. The core optimization is that the compiler is allowed to rewrite any occurrence of `get(set(x, k, v), k)` into `v` without additional legality checks. In particular, the compiler performs no type checks, conversions, etc. The higher level implementation code is expected to do all that. This approach closely matches the general direction we've been taking in external AbstractInterpreters for embedding additional semantics and optimization opportunities into Julia code (although we generally use methods there, rather than full generic functions), so I think we have some evidence that this sort of approach works reasonably well. Nevertheless, this is certainly an experiment and the interface is explicitly declared unstable. This is fully working and implemented, but the optimization currently bails on anything but the simplest cases. Filling all those cases in is not particularly hard, but should be done along with a more invasive refactoring of SROA, so we should figure out the general direction here first and then we can finish all that up in a follow-up cleanup. Before: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 993 evaluations. Range (min … max): 32.940 ns … 28.754 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 99.76% Time (median): 49.647 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 57.519 ns ± 333.275 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 10.81% ± 2.22% ▃█▅ ▁▃▅▅▃▁ ▁▃▂ ▂ ▁▂▄▃▅▇███▇▃▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅██████▅▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▇███▇▆███▆▄▃▃▂▂ ▃ 32.9 ns Histogram: frequency by time 68.6 ns < Memory estimate: 128 bytes, allocs estimate: 4. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ %1 = invoke Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.undef::UndefInitializer, 1::Int64)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %2 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, %1, 0x00000000)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64} │ %3 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}, :a, 1)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64} │ %4 = Base.getfield(%2, :data)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %5 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool └── goto #5 if not %5 2 ─ %7 = Base.sub_int(1, 1)::Int64 │ %8 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %7)::UInt64 │ %9 = Base.getfield(%4, :size)::Tuple{Int64} │ %10 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool │ %11 = Base.getfield(%9, 1, %10)::Int64 │ %12 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %11)::UInt64 │ %13 = Base.ult_int(%8, %12)::Bool └── goto #4 if not %13 3 ─ goto #5 4 ─ %16 = Core.tuple(1)::Tuple{Int64} │ invoke Base.throw_boundserror(%4::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}, %16::Tuple{Int64})::Union{} └── unreachable 5 ┄ %19 = Base.getfield(%4, :ref)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %20 = Base.memoryref(%19, 1, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ Base.memoryrefset!(%20, %3, :not_atomic, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} └── goto #6 6 ─ %23 = Base.getfield(%2, :bitmap)::UInt32 │ %24 = Base.or_int(%23, 0x00010000)::UInt32 │ Base.setfield!(%2, :bitmap, %24)::UInt32 └── goto #7 7 ─ %27 = %new(Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, %2)::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64} └── goto #8 8 ─ %29 = invoke Base.getindex(%27::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, 🅰️:Symbol)::Int64 └── return %29 ``` After: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1000 evaluations. Range (min … max): 2.459 ns … 11.320 ns ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 2.460 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 2.469 ns ± 0.183 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▂ █ ▁ █ ▂ █▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁█ █ 2.46 ns Histogram: log(frequency) by time 2.47 ns < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ return 1 ```

@benchmark

This is part of the work to address #51352 by attempting to allow the compiler to perform SRAO on persistent data structures like `PersistentDict` as if they were regular immutable data structures. These sorts of data structures have very complicated internals (with lots of mutation, memory sharing, etc.), but a relatively simple interface. As such, it is unlikely that our compiler will have sufficient power to optimize this interface by analyzing the implementation. We thus need to come up with some other mechanism that gives the compiler license to perform the requisite optimization. One way would be to just hardcode `PersistentDict` into the compiler, optimizing it like any of the other builtin datatypes. However, this is of course very unsatisfying. At the other end of the spectrum would be something like a generic rewrite rule system (e-graphs anyone?) that would let the PersistentDict implementation declare its interface to the compiler and the compiler would use this for optimization (in a perfect world, the actual rewrite would then be checked using some sort of formal methods). I think that would be interesting, but we're very far from even being able to design something like that (at least in Base - experiments with external AbstractInterpreters in this direction are encouraged). This PR tries to come up with a reasonable middle ground, where the compiler gets some knowledge of the protocol hardcoded without having to know about the implementation details of the data structure. The basic ideas is that `Core` provides some magic generic functions that implementations can extend. Semantically, they are not special. They dispatch as usual, and implementations are expected to work properly even in the absence of any compiler optimizations. However, the compiler is semantically permitted to perform structural optimization using these magic generic functions. In the concrete case, this PR introduces the `KeyValue` interface which consists of two generic functions, `get` and `set`. The core optimization is that the compiler is allowed to rewrite any occurrence of `get(set(x, k, v), k)` into `v` without additional legality checks. In particular, the compiler performs no type checks, conversions, etc. The higher level implementation code is expected to do all that. This approach closely matches the general direction we've been taking in external AbstractInterpreters for embedding additional semantics and optimization opportunities into Julia code (although we generally use methods there, rather than full generic functions), so I think we have some evidence that this sort of approach works reasonably well. Nevertheless, this is certainly an experiment and the interface is explicitly declared unstable. This is fully working and implemented, but the optimization currently bails on anything but the simplest cases. Filling all those cases in is not particularly hard, but should be done along with a more invasive refactoring of SROA, so we should figure out the general direction here first and then we can finish all that up in a follow-up cleanup. Before: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 993 evaluations. Range (min … max): 32.940 ns … 28.754 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 99.76% Time (median): 49.647 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 57.519 ns ± 333.275 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 10.81% ± 2.22% ▃█▅ ▁▃▅▅▃▁ ▁▃▂ ▂ ▁▂▄▃▅▇███▇▃▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅██████▅▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▇███▇▆███▆▄▃▃▂▂ ▃ 32.9 ns Histogram: frequency by time 68.6 ns < Memory estimate: 128 bytes, allocs estimate: 4. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ %1 = invoke Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.undef::UndefInitializer, 1::Int64)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %2 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, %1, 0x00000000)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64} │ %3 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}, :a, 1)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64} │ %4 = Base.getfield(%2, :data)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %5 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool └── goto #5 if not %5 2 ─ %7 = Base.sub_int(1, 1)::Int64 │ %8 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %7)::UInt64 │ %9 = Base.getfield(%4, :size)::Tuple{Int64} │ %10 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool │ %11 = Base.getfield(%9, 1, %10)::Int64 │ %12 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %11)::UInt64 │ %13 = Base.ult_int(%8, %12)::Bool └── goto #4 if not %13 3 ─ goto #5 4 ─ %16 = Core.tuple(1)::Tuple{Int64} │ invoke Base.throw_boundserror(%4::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}, %16::Tuple{Int64})::Union{} └── unreachable 5 ┄ %19 = Base.getfield(%4, :ref)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %20 = Base.memoryref(%19, 1, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ Base.memoryrefset!(%20, %3, :not_atomic, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} └── goto #6 6 ─ %23 = Base.getfield(%2, :bitmap)::UInt32 │ %24 = Base.or_int(%23, 0x00010000)::UInt32 │ Base.setfield!(%2, :bitmap, %24)::UInt32 └── goto #7 7 ─ %27 = %new(Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, %2)::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64} └── goto #8 8 ─ %29 = invoke Base.getindex(%27::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, 🅰️:Symbol)::Int64 └── return %29 ``` After: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1000 evaluations. Range (min … max): 2.459 ns … 11.320 ns ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 2.460 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 2.469 ns ± 0.183 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▂ █ ▁ █ ▂ █▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁█ █ 2.46 ns Histogram: log(frequency) by time 2.47 ns < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ return 1 ```

@benchmark

This is part of the work to address #51352 by attempting to allow the compiler to perform SRAO on persistent data structures like `PersistentDict` as if they were regular immutable data structures. These sorts of data structures have very complicated internals (with lots of mutation, memory sharing, etc.), but a relatively simple interface. As such, it is unlikely that our compiler will have sufficient power to optimize this interface by analyzing the implementation. We thus need to come up with some other mechanism that gives the compiler license to perform the requisite optimization. One way would be to just hardcode `PersistentDict` into the compiler, optimizing it like any of the other builtin datatypes. However, this is of course very unsatisfying. At the other end of the spectrum would be something like a generic rewrite rule system (e-graphs anyone?) that would let the PersistentDict implementation declare its interface to the compiler and the compiler would use this for optimization (in a perfect world, the actual rewrite would then be checked using some sort of formal methods). I think that would be interesting, but we're very far from even being able to design something like that (at least in Base - experiments with external AbstractInterpreters in this direction are encouraged). This PR tries to come up with a reasonable middle ground, where the compiler gets some knowledge of the protocol hardcoded without having to know about the implementation details of the data structure. The basic ideas is that `Core` provides some magic generic functions that implementations can extend. Semantically, they are not special. They dispatch as usual, and implementations are expected to work properly even in the absence of any compiler optimizations. However, the compiler is semantically permitted to perform structural optimization using these magic generic functions. In the concrete case, this PR introduces the `KeyValue` interface which consists of two generic functions, `get` and `set`. The core optimization is that the compiler is allowed to rewrite any occurrence of `get(set(x, k, v), k)` into `v` without additional legality checks. In particular, the compiler performs no type checks, conversions, etc. The higher level implementation code is expected to do all that. This approach closely matches the general direction we've been taking in external AbstractInterpreters for embedding additional semantics and optimization opportunities into Julia code (although we generally use methods there, rather than full generic functions), so I think we have some evidence that this sort of approach works reasonably well. Nevertheless, this is certainly an experiment and the interface is explicitly declared unstable. ## Current Status This is fully working and implemented, but the optimization currently bails on anything but the simplest cases. Filling all those cases in is not particularly hard, but should be done along with a more invasive refactoring of SROA, so we should figure out the general direction here first and then we can finish all that up in a follow-up cleanup. ## Obligatory benchmark Before: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 993 evaluations. Range (min … max): 32.940 ns … 28.754 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 99.76% Time (median): 49.647 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 57.519 ns ± 333.275 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 10.81% ± 2.22% ▃█▅ ▁▃▅▅▃▁ ▁▃▂ ▂ ▁▂▄▃▅▇███▇▃▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅██████▅▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▇███▇▆███▆▄▃▃▂▂ ▃ 32.9 ns Histogram: frequency by time 68.6 ns < Memory estimate: 128 bytes, allocs estimate: 4. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ %1 = invoke Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.undef::UndefInitializer, 1::Int64)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %2 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, %1, 0x00000000)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64} │ %3 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}, :a, 1)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64} │ %4 = Base.getfield(%2, :data)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %5 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool └── goto #5 if not %5 2 ─ %7 = Base.sub_int(1, 1)::Int64 │ %8 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %7)::UInt64 │ %9 = Base.getfield(%4, :size)::Tuple{Int64} │ %10 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool │ %11 = Base.getfield(%9, 1, %10)::Int64 │ %12 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %11)::UInt64 │ %13 = Base.ult_int(%8, %12)::Bool └── goto #4 if not %13 3 ─ goto #5 4 ─ %16 = Core.tuple(1)::Tuple{Int64} │ invoke Base.throw_boundserror(%4::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}, %16::Tuple{Int64})::Union{} └── unreachable 5 ┄ %19 = Base.getfield(%4, :ref)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %20 = Base.memoryref(%19, 1, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ Base.memoryrefset!(%20, %3, :not_atomic, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} └── goto #6 6 ─ %23 = Base.getfield(%2, :bitmap)::UInt32 │ %24 = Base.or_int(%23, 0x00010000)::UInt32 │ Base.setfield!(%2, :bitmap, %24)::UInt32 └── goto #7 7 ─ %27 = %new(Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, %2)::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64} └── goto #8 8 ─ %29 = invoke Base.getindex(%27::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, 🅰️:Symbol)::Int64 └── return %29 ``` After: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1000 evaluations. Range (min … max): 2.459 ns … 11.320 ns ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 2.460 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 2.469 ns ± 0.183 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▂ █ ▁ █ ▂ █▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁█ █ 2.46 ns Histogram: log(frequency) by time 2.47 ns < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ return 1 ```

@benchmark

This is part of the work to address JuliaLang#51352 by attempting to allow the compiler to perform SRAO on persistent data structures like `PersistentDict` as if they were regular immutable data structures. These sorts of data structures have very complicated internals (with lots of mutation, memory sharing, etc.), but a relatively simple interface. As such, it is unlikely that our compiler will have sufficient power to optimize this interface by analyzing the implementation. We thus need to come up with some other mechanism that gives the compiler license to perform the requisite optimization. One way would be to just hardcode `PersistentDict` into the compiler, optimizing it like any of the other builtin datatypes. However, this is of course very unsatisfying. At the other end of the spectrum would be something like a generic rewrite rule system (e-graphs anyone?) that would let the PersistentDict implementation declare its interface to the compiler and the compiler would use this for optimization (in a perfect world, the actual rewrite would then be checked using some sort of formal methods). I think that would be interesting, but we're very far from even being able to design something like that (at least in Base - experiments with external AbstractInterpreters in this direction are encouraged). This PR tries to come up with a reasonable middle ground, where the compiler gets some knowledge of the protocol hardcoded without having to know about the implementation details of the data structure. The basic ideas is that `Core` provides some magic generic functions that implementations can extend. Semantically, they are not special. They dispatch as usual, and implementations are expected to work properly even in the absence of any compiler optimizations. However, the compiler is semantically permitted to perform structural optimization using these magic generic functions. In the concrete case, this PR introduces the `KeyValue` interface which consists of two generic functions, `get` and `set`. The core optimization is that the compiler is allowed to rewrite any occurrence of `get(set(x, k, v), k)` into `v` without additional legality checks. In particular, the compiler performs no type checks, conversions, etc. The higher level implementation code is expected to do all that. This approach closely matches the general direction we've been taking in external AbstractInterpreters for embedding additional semantics and optimization opportunities into Julia code (although we generally use methods there, rather than full generic functions), so I think we have some evidence that this sort of approach works reasonably well. Nevertheless, this is certainly an experiment and the interface is explicitly declared unstable. ## Current Status This is fully working and implemented, but the optimization currently bails on anything but the simplest cases. Filling all those cases in is not particularly hard, but should be done along with a more invasive refactoring of SROA, so we should figure out the general direction here first and then we can finish all that up in a follow-up cleanup. ## Obligatory benchmark Before: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 993 evaluations. Range (min … max): 32.940 ns … 28.754 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 99.76% Time (median): 49.647 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 57.519 ns ± 333.275 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 10.81% ± 2.22% ▃█▅ ▁▃▅▅▃▁ ▁▃▂ ▂ ▁▂▄▃▅▇███▇▃▁▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▂▅██████▅▂▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂▃▃▇███▇▆███▆▄▃▃▂▂ ▃ 32.9 ns Histogram: frequency by time 68.6 ns < Memory estimate: 128 bytes, allocs estimate: 4. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ %1 = invoke Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.undef::UndefInitializer, 1::Int64)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %2 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, %1, 0x00000000)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64} │ %3 = %new(Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}, :a, 1)::Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64} │ %4 = Base.getfield(%2, :data)::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %5 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool └── goto JuliaLang#5 if not %5 2 ─ %7 = Base.sub_int(1, 1)::Int64 │ %8 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %7)::UInt64 │ %9 = Base.getfield(%4, :size)::Tuple{Int64} │ %10 = $(Expr(:boundscheck, true))::Bool │ %11 = Base.getfield(%9, 1, %10)::Int64 │ %12 = Base.bitcast(UInt64, %11)::UInt64 │ %13 = Base.ult_int(%8, %12)::Bool └── goto JuliaLang#4 if not %13 3 ─ goto JuliaLang#5 4 ─ %16 = Core.tuple(1)::Tuple{Int64} │ invoke Base.throw_boundserror(%4::Vector{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}}, %16::Tuple{Int64})::Union{} └── unreachable 5 ┄ %19 = Base.getfield(%4, :ref)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ %20 = Base.memoryref(%19, 1, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} │ Base.memoryrefset!(%20, %3, :not_atomic, false)::MemoryRef{Union{Base.HashArrayMappedTries.HAMT{Symbol, Int64}, Base.HashArrayMappedTries.Leaf{Symbol, Int64}}} └── goto JuliaLang#6 6 ─ %23 = Base.getfield(%2, :bitmap)::UInt32 │ %24 = Base.or_int(%23, 0x00010000)::UInt32 │ Base.setfield!(%2, :bitmap, %24)::UInt32 └── goto JuliaLang#7 7 ─ %27 = %new(Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, %2)::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64} └── goto JuliaLang#8 8 ─ %29 = invoke Base.getindex(%27::Base.PersistentDict{Symbol, Int64}, 🅰️:Symbol)::Int64 └── return %29 ``` After: ``` julia> using BenchmarkTools julia> function foo() a = Base.PersistentDict(:a => 1) return a[:a] end foo (generic function with 1 method) julia> @benchmark foo() BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1000 evaluations. Range (min … max): 2.459 ns … 11.320 ns ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 2.460 ns ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 2.469 ns ± 0.183 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▂ █ ▁ █ ▂ █▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁█▁▁▁▁█ █ 2.46 ns Histogram: log(frequency) by time 2.47 ns < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. julia> @code_typed foo() CodeInfo( 1 ─ return 1 ```

@something

`@something` eagerly unwraps any `Some` given to it, while keeping the variable between its arguments the same. This can be an issue if a previously unpacked value is used as input to `@something`, leading to a type instability on more than two arguments (e.g. because of a fallback to `Some(nothing)`). By using different variables for each argument, type inference has an easier time handling these cases that are isolated to single branches anyway. This also adds some comments to the macro, since it's non-obvious what it does. Benchmarking the specific case I encountered this in led to a ~2x performance improvement on multiple machines. 1.10-beta3/master: ``` [sukera@tower 01]$ jl1100 -q --project=. -L 01.jl -e 'bench()' v"1.10.0-beta3" BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1 evaluation. Range (min … max): 38.670 μs … 70.350 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 43.340 μs ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 43.395 μs ± 1.518 μs ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▆█▂ ▁▁ ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▁▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▄▇███▆██▄▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ ▃ 38.7 μs Histogram: frequency by time 48 μs < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. ``` This PR: ``` [sukera@tower 01]$ julia -q --project=. -L 01.jl -e 'bench()' v"1.11.0-DEV.970" BenchmarkTools.Trial: 10000 samples with 1 evaluation. Range (min … max): 22.820 μs … 44.980 μs ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00% Time (median): 24.300 μs ┊ GC (median): 0.00% Time (mean ± σ): 24.370 μs ± 832.239 ns ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00% ▂▅▇██▇▆▅▁ ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▄▅▇███████████▅▄▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▁▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▁▁▂▂ ▃ 22.8 μs Histogram: frequency by time 27.7 μs < Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0. ``` <details> <summary>Benchmarking code (spoilers for Advent Of Code 2023 Day 01, Part 01). Running this requires the input of that Advent Of Code day.</summary> ```julia using BenchmarkTools using InteractiveUtils isdigit(d::UInt8) = UInt8('0') <= d <= UInt8('9') someDigit(c::UInt8) = isdigit(c) ? Some(c - UInt8('0')) : nothing function part1(data) total = 0 may_a = nothing may_b = nothing for c in data digitRes = someDigit(c) may_a = @something may_a digitRes Some(nothing) may_b = @something digitRes may_b Some(nothing) if c == UInt8('\n') digit_a = may_a::UInt8 digit_b = may_b::UInt8 total += digit_a*0xa + digit_b may_a = nothing may_b = nothing end end return total end function bench() data = read("input.txt") display(VERSION) println() display(@benchmark part1($data)) nothing end ``` </details> <details> <summary>`@code_warntype` before</summary> ```julia julia> @code_warntype part1(data) MethodInstance for part1(::Vector{UInt8}) from part1(data) @ Main ~/Documents/projects/AOC/2023/01/01.jl:7 Arguments #self#::Core.Const(part1) data::Vector{UInt8} Locals @_3::Union{Nothing, Tuple{UInt8, Int64}} may_b::Union{Nothing, UInt8} may_a::Union{Nothing, UInt8} total::Int64 c::UInt8 digit_b::UInt8 digit_a::UInt8 val@_10::Any val@_11::Any digitRes::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} @_13::Union{Some{Nothing}, Some{UInt8}, UInt8} @_14::Union{Some{Nothing}, Some{UInt8}} @_15::Some{Nothing} @_16::Union{Some{Nothing}, Some{UInt8}, UInt8} @_17::Union{Some{Nothing}, UInt8} @_18::Some{Nothing} Body::Int64 1 ── (total = 0) │ (may_a = Main.nothing) │ (may_b = Main.nothing) │ %4 = data::Vector{UInt8} │ (@_3 = Base.iterate(%4)) │ %6 = (@_3 === nothing)::Bool │ %7 = Base.not_int(%6)::Bool └─── goto #24 if not %7 2 ┄─ Core.NewvarNode(:(digit_b)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(digit_a)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(val@_10)) │ %12 = @_3::Tuple{UInt8, Int64} │ (c = Core.getfield(%12, 1)) │ %14 = Core.getfield(%12, 2)::Int64 │ (digitRes = Main.someDigit(c)) │ (val@_11 = may_a) │ %17 = (val@_11::Union{Nothing, UInt8} !== Base.nothing)::Bool └─── goto #4 if not %17 3 ── (@_13 = val@_11::UInt8) └─── goto #11 4 ── (val@_11 = digitRes) │ %22 = (val@_11::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} !== Base.nothing)::Bool └─── goto #6 if not %22 5 ── (@_14 = val@_11::Some{UInt8}) └─── goto #10 6 ── (val@_11 = Main.Some(Main.nothing)) │ %27 = (val@_11::Core.Const(Some(nothing)) !== Base.nothing)::Core.Const(true) └─── goto #8 if not %27 7 ── (@_15 = val@_11::Core.Const(Some(nothing))) └─── goto #9 8 ── Core.Const(:(@_15 = Base.nothing)) 9 ┄─ (@_14 = @_15) 10 ┄ (@_13 = @_14) 11 ┄ %34 = @_13::Union{Some{Nothing}, Some{UInt8}, UInt8} │ (may_a = Base.something(%34)) │ (val@_10 = digitRes) │ %37 = (val@_10::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} !== Base.nothing)::Bool └─── goto #13 if not %37 12 ─ (@_16 = val@_10::Some{UInt8}) └─── goto #20 13 ─ (val@_10 = may_b) │ %42 = (val@_10::Union{Nothing, UInt8} !== Base.nothing)::Bool └─── goto #15 if not %42 14 ─ (@_17 = val@_10::UInt8) └─── goto #19 15 ─ (val@_10 = Main.Some(Main.nothing)) │ %47 = (val@_10::Core.Const(Some(nothing)) !== Base.nothing)::Core.Const(true) └─── goto #17 if not %47 16 ─ (@_18 = val@_10::Core.Const(Some(nothing))) └─── goto #18 17 ─ Core.Const(:(@_18 = Base.nothing)) 18 ┄ (@_17 = @_18) 19 ┄ (@_16 = @_17) 20 ┄ %54 = @_16::Union{Some{Nothing}, Some{UInt8}, UInt8} │ (may_b = Base.something(%54)) │ %56 = c::UInt8 │ %57 = Main.UInt8('\n')::Core.Const(0x0a) │ %58 = (%56 == %57)::Bool └─── goto #22 if not %58 21 ─ (digit_a = Core.typeassert(may_a, Main.UInt8)) │ (digit_b = Core.typeassert(may_b, Main.UInt8)) │ %62 = total::Int64 │ %63 = (digit_a * 0x0a)::UInt8 │ %64 = (%63 + digit_b)::UInt8 │ (total = %62 + %64) │ (may_a = Main.nothing) └─── (may_b = Main.nothing) 22 ┄ (@_3 = Base.iterate(%4, %14)) │ %69 = (@_3 === nothing)::Bool │ %70 = Base.not_int(%69)::Bool └─── goto #24 if not %70 23 ─ goto #2 24 ┄ return total ``` </details> <details> <summary>`@code_native debuginfo=:none` Before </summary> ```julia julia> @code_native debuginfo=:none part1(data) .text .file "part1" .globl julia_part1_418 # -- Begin function julia_part1_418 .p2align 4, 0x90 .type julia_part1_418,@function julia_part1_418: # @julia_part1_418 # %bb.0: # %top push rbp mov rbp, rsp push r15 push r14 push r13 push r12 push rbx sub rsp, 40 mov rax, qword ptr [rdi + 8] test rax, rax je .LBB0_1 # %bb.2: # %L17 mov rcx, qword ptr [rdi] dec rax mov r10b, 1 xor r14d, r14d # implicit-def: $r12b # implicit-def: $r13b # implicit-def: $r9b # implicit-def: $sil mov qword ptr [rbp - 64], rax # 8-byte Spill mov al, 1 mov dword ptr [rbp - 48], eax # 4-byte Spill # implicit-def: $al # kill: killed $al xor eax, eax mov qword ptr [rbp - 56], rax # 8-byte Spill mov qword ptr [rbp - 72], rcx # 8-byte Spill # implicit-def: $cl jmp .LBB0_3 .p2align 4, 0x90 .LBB0_8: # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov dword ptr [rbp - 48], 0 # 4-byte Folded Spill .LBB0_24: # %post_union_move # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 movzx r13d, byte ptr [rbp - 41] # 1-byte Folded Reload mov r12d, r8d cmp qword ptr [rbp - 64], r14 # 8-byte Folded Reload je .LBB0_13 .LBB0_25: # %guard_exit113 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 inc r14 mov r10d, ebx .LBB0_3: # %L19 # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1 mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - 72] # 8-byte Reload xor ebx, ebx xor edi, edi movzx r15d, r9b movzx ecx, cl movzx esi, sil mov r11b, 1 # implicit-def: $r9b movzx edx, byte ptr [rax + r14] lea eax, [rdx - 58] lea r8d, [rdx - 48] cmp al, -10 setae bl setb dil test r10b, 1 cmovne r15d, edi mov edi, 0 cmovne ecx, ebx mov bl, 1 cmovne esi, edi test r15b, 1 jne .LBB0_7 # %bb.4: # %L76 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov r11b, 2 test cl, 1 jne .LBB0_5 # %bb.6: # %L78 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov ebx, r10d mov r9d, r15d mov byte ptr [rbp - 41], r13b # 1-byte Spill test sil, 1 je .LBB0_26 .LBB0_7: # %L82 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 cmp al, -11 jbe .LBB0_9 jmp .LBB0_8 .p2align 4, 0x90 .LBB0_5: # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov ecx, r8d mov sil, 1 xor ebx, ebx mov byte ptr [rbp - 41], r8b # 1-byte Spill xor r9d, r9d xor ecx, ecx cmp al, -11 ja .LBB0_8 .LBB0_9: # %L90 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 test byte ptr [rbp - 48], 1 # 1-byte Folded Reload jne .LBB0_23 # %bb.10: # %L115 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 cmp dl, 10 jne .LBB0_11 # %bb.14: # %L122 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 test r15b, 1 jne .LBB0_15 # %bb.12: # %L130.thread # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 movzx eax, byte ptr [rbp - 41] # 1-byte Folded Reload mov bl, 1 add eax, eax lea eax, [rax + 4*rax] add al, r12b movzx eax, al add qword ptr [rbp - 56], rax # 8-byte Folded Spill mov al, 1 mov dword ptr [rbp - 48], eax # 4-byte Spill cmp qword ptr [rbp - 64], r14 # 8-byte Folded Reload jne .LBB0_25 jmp .LBB0_13 .p2align 4, 0x90 .LBB0_23: # %L115.thread # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov al, 1 # implicit-def: $r8b mov dword ptr [rbp - 48], eax # 4-byte Spill cmp dl, 10 jne .LBB0_24 jmp .LBB0_21 .LBB0_11: # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov r8d, r12d jmp .LBB0_24 .LBB0_1: xor eax, eax mov qword ptr [rbp - 56], rax # 8-byte Spill .LBB0_13: # %L159 mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - 56] # 8-byte Reload add rsp, 40 pop rbx pop r12 pop r13 pop r14 pop r15 pop rbp ret .LBB0_21: # %L122.thread test r15b, 1 jne .LBB0_15 # %bb.22: # %post_box_union58 movabs rdi, offset .L_j_str1 movabs rax, offset ijl_type_error movabs rsi, 140008511215408 movabs rdx, 140008667209736 call rax .LBB0_15: # %fail cmp r11b, 1 je .LBB0_19 # %bb.16: # %fail movzx eax, r11b cmp eax, 2 jne .LBB0_17 # %bb.20: # %box_union54 movzx eax, byte ptr [rbp - 41] # 1-byte Folded Reload movabs rcx, offset jl_boxed_uint8_cache mov rdx, qword ptr [rcx + 8*rax] jmp .LBB0_18 .LBB0_26: # %L80 movabs rax, offset ijl_throw movabs rdi, 140008495049392 call rax .LBB0_19: # %box_union movabs rdx, 140008667209736 jmp .LBB0_18 .LBB0_17: xor edx, edx .LBB0_18: # %post_box_union movabs rdi, offset .L_j_str1 movabs rax, offset ijl_type_error movabs rsi, 140008511215408 call rax .Lfunc_end0: .size julia_part1_418, .Lfunc_end0-julia_part1_418 # -- End function .type .L_j_str1,@object # @_j_str1 .section .rodata.str1.1,"aMS",@progbits,1 .L_j_str1: .asciz "typeassert" .size .L_j_str1, 11 .section ".note.GNU-stack","",@progbits ``` </details> <details> <summary>`@code_warntype` After</summary> ```julia [sukera@tower 01]$ julia -q --project=. -L 01.jl julia> data = read("input.txt"); julia> @code_warntype part1(data) MethodInstance for part1(::Vector{UInt8}) from part1(data) @ Main ~/Documents/projects/AOC/2023/01/01.jl:7 Arguments #self#::Core.Const(part1) data::Vector{UInt8} Locals @_3::Union{Nothing, Tuple{UInt8, Int64}} may_b::Union{Nothing, UInt8} may_a::Union{Nothing, UInt8} total::Int64 val@_7::Union{} val@_8::Union{} c::UInt8 digit_b::UInt8 digit_a::UInt8 ##215::Some{Nothing} ##216::Union{Nothing, UInt8} ##217::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} ##212::Some{Nothing} ##213::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} ##214::Union{Nothing, UInt8} digitRes::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} @_19::Union{Nothing, UInt8} @_20::Union{Nothing, UInt8} @_21::Nothing @_22::Union{Nothing, UInt8} @_23::Union{Nothing, UInt8} @_24::Nothing Body::Int64 1 ── (total = 0) │ (may_a = Main.nothing) │ (may_b = Main.nothing) │ %4 = data::Vector{UInt8} │ (@_3 = Base.iterate(%4)) │ %6 = @_3::Union{Nothing, Tuple{UInt8, Int64}} │ %7 = (%6 === nothing)::Bool │ %8 = Base.not_int(%7)::Bool └─── goto #24 if not %8 2 ┄─ Core.NewvarNode(:(val@_7)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(val@_8)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(digit_b)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(digit_a)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(##215)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(##216)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(##217)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(##212)) │ Core.NewvarNode(:(##213)) │ %19 = @_3::Tuple{UInt8, Int64} │ (c = Core.getfield(%19, 1)) │ %21 = Core.getfield(%19, 2)::Int64 │ %22 = c::UInt8 │ (digitRes = Main.someDigit(%22)) │ %24 = may_a::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ (##214 = %24) │ %26 = Base.:!::Core.Const(!) │ %27 = ##214::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ %28 = Base.isnothing(%27)::Bool │ %29 = (%26)(%28)::Bool └─── goto #4 if not %29 3 ── %31 = ##214::UInt8 │ (@_19 = Base.something(%31)) └─── goto #11 4 ── %34 = digitRes::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} │ (##213 = %34) │ %36 = Base.:!::Core.Const(!) │ %37 = ##213::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} │ %38 = Base.isnothing(%37)::Bool │ %39 = (%36)(%38)::Bool └─── goto #6 if not %39 5 ── %41 = ##213::Some{UInt8} │ (@_20 = Base.something(%41)) └─── goto #10 6 ── %44 = Main.Some::Core.Const(Some) │ %45 = Main.nothing::Core.Const(nothing) │ (##212 = (%44)(%45)) │ %47 = Base.:!::Core.Const(!) │ %48 = ##212::Core.Const(Some(nothing)) │ %49 = Base.isnothing(%48)::Core.Const(false) │ %50 = (%47)(%49)::Core.Const(true) └─── goto #8 if not %50 7 ── %52 = ##212::Core.Const(Some(nothing)) │ (@_21 = Base.something(%52)) └─── goto #9 8 ── Core.Const(nothing) │ Core.Const(:(val@_8 = Base.something(Base.nothing))) │ Core.Const(nothing) │ Core.Const(:(val@_8)) └─── Core.Const(:(@_21 = %58)) 9 ┄─ %60 = @_21::Core.Const(nothing) └─── (@_20 = %60) 10 ┄ %62 = @_20::Union{Nothing, UInt8} └─── (@_19 = %62) 11 ┄ %64 = @_19::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ (may_a = %64) │ %66 = digitRes::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} │ (##217 = %66) │ %68 = Base.:!::Core.Const(!) │ %69 = ##217::Union{Nothing, Some{UInt8}} │ %70 = Base.isnothing(%69)::Bool │ %71 = (%68)(%70)::Bool └─── goto #13 if not %71 12 ─ %73 = ##217::Some{UInt8} │ (@_22 = Base.something(%73)) └─── goto #20 13 ─ %76 = may_b::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ (##216 = %76) │ %78 = Base.:!::Core.Const(!) │ %79 = ##216::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ %80 = Base.isnothing(%79)::Bool │ %81 = (%78)(%80)::Bool └─── goto #15 if not %81 14 ─ %83 = ##216::UInt8 │ (@_23 = Base.something(%83)) └─── goto #19 15 ─ %86 = Main.Some::Core.Const(Some) │ %87 = Main.nothing::Core.Const(nothing) │ (##215 = (%86)(%87)) │ %89 = Base.:!::Core.Const(!) │ %90 = ##215::Core.Const(Some(nothing)) │ %91 = Base.isnothing(%90)::Core.Const(false) │ %92 = (%89)(%91)::Core.Const(true) └─── goto #17 if not %92 16 ─ %94 = ##215::Core.Const(Some(nothing)) │ (@_24 = Base.something(%94)) └─── goto #18 17 ─ Core.Const(nothing) │ Core.Const(:(val@_7 = Base.something(Base.nothing))) │ Core.Const(nothing) │ Core.Const(:(val@_7)) └─── Core.Const(:(@_24 = %100)) 18 ┄ %102 = @_24::Core.Const(nothing) └─── (@_23 = %102) 19 ┄ %104 = @_23::Union{Nothing, UInt8} └─── (@_22 = %104) 20 ┄ %106 = @_22::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ (may_b = %106) │ %108 = Main.:(==)::Core.Const(==) │ %109 = c::UInt8 │ %110 = Main.UInt8('\n')::Core.Const(0x0a) │ %111 = (%108)(%109, %110)::Bool └─── goto #22 if not %111 21 ─ %113 = may_a::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ (digit_a = Core.typeassert(%113, Main.UInt8)) │ %115 = may_b::Union{Nothing, UInt8} │ (digit_b = Core.typeassert(%115, Main.UInt8)) │ %117 = Main.:+::Core.Const(+) │ %118 = total::Int64 │ %119 = Main.:+::Core.Const(+) │ %120 = Main.:*::Core.Const(*) │ %121 = digit_a::UInt8 │ %122 = (%120)(%121, 0x0a)::UInt8 │ %123 = digit_b::UInt8 │ %124 = (%119)(%122, %123)::UInt8 │ (total = (%117)(%118, %124)) │ (may_a = Main.nothing) └─── (may_b = Main.nothing) 22 ┄ (@_3 = Base.iterate(%4, %21)) │ %129 = @_3::Union{Nothing, Tuple{UInt8, Int64}} │ %130 = (%129 === nothing)::Bool │ %131 = Base.not_int(%130)::Bool └─── goto #24 if not %131 23 ─ goto #2 24 ┄ %134 = total::Int64 └─── return %134 ``` </details> <details> <summary>`@code_native debuginfo=:none` After </summary> ```julia julia> @code_native debuginfo=:none part1(data) .text .file "part1" .globl julia_part1_1203 # -- Begin function julia_part1_1203 .p2align 4, 0x90 .type julia_part1_1203,@function julia_part1_1203: # @julia_part1_1203 ; Function Signature: part1(Array{UInt8, 1}) # %bb.0: # %top #DEBUG_VALUE: part1:data <- [DW_OP_deref] $rdi push rbp mov rbp, rsp push r15 push r14 push r13 push r12 push rbx sub rsp, 40 vxorps xmm0, xmm0, xmm0 #APP mov rax, qword ptr fs:[0] #NO_APP lea rdx, [rbp - 64] vmovaps xmmword ptr [rbp - 64], xmm0 mov qword ptr [rbp - 48], 0 mov rcx, qword ptr [rax - 8] mov qword ptr [rbp - 64], 4 mov rax, qword ptr [rcx] mov qword ptr [rbp - 72], rcx # 8-byte Spill mov qword ptr [rbp - 56], rax mov qword ptr [rcx], rdx #DEBUG_VALUE: part1:data <- [DW_OP_deref] 0 mov r15, qword ptr [rdi + 16] test r15, r15 je .LBB0_1 # %bb.2: # %L34 mov r14, qword ptr [rdi] dec r15 mov r11b, 1 mov r13b, 1 # implicit-def: $r12b # implicit-def: $r10b xor eax, eax jmp .LBB0_3 .p2align 4, 0x90 .LBB0_4: # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 xor r11d, r11d mov ebx, edi mov r10d, r8d .LBB0_9: # %L114 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov r12d, esi test r15, r15 je .LBB0_12 .LBB0_10: # %guard_exit126 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 inc r14 dec r15 mov r13d, ebx .LBB0_3: # %L36 # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1 movzx edx, byte ptr [r14] test r13b, 1 movzx edi, r13b mov ebx, 1 mov ecx, 0 cmove ebx, edi cmovne edi, ecx movzx ecx, r10b lea esi, [rdx - 48] lea r9d, [rdx - 58] movzx r8d, sil cmove r8d, ecx cmp r9b, -11 ja .LBB0_4 # %bb.5: # %L89 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 test r11b, 1 jne .LBB0_8 # %bb.6: # %L102 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 cmp dl, 10 jne .LBB0_7 # %bb.13: # %L106 # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 test r13b, 1 jne .LBB0_14 # %bb.11: # %L114.thread # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 add ecx, ecx mov bl, 1 mov r11b, 1 lea ecx, [rcx + 4*rcx] add cl, r12b movzx ecx, cl add rax, rcx test r15, r15 jne .LBB0_10 jmp .LBB0_12 .p2align 4, 0x90 .LBB0_8: # %L102.thread # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov r11b, 1 # implicit-def: $sil cmp dl, 10 jne .LBB0_9 jmp .LBB0_15 .LBB0_7: # in Loop: Header=BB0_3 Depth=1 mov esi, r12d jmp .LBB0_9 .LBB0_1: xor eax, eax .LBB0_12: # %L154 mov rcx, qword ptr [rbp - 56] mov rdx, qword ptr [rbp - 72] # 8-byte Reload mov qword ptr [rdx], rcx add rsp, 40 pop rbx pop r12 pop r13 pop r14 pop r15 pop rbp ret .LBB0_15: # %L106.thread test r13b, 1 jne .LBB0_14 # %bb.16: # %post_box_union47 movabs rax, offset jl_nothing movabs rcx, offset jl_small_typeof movabs rdi, offset ".L_j_str_typeassert#1" mov rdx, qword ptr [rax] mov rsi, qword ptr [rcx + 336] movabs rax, offset ijl_type_error mov qword ptr [rbp - 48], rsi call rax .LBB0_14: # %post_box_union movabs rax, offset jl_nothing movabs rcx, offset jl_small_typeof movabs rdi, offset ".L_j_str_typeassert#1" mov rdx, qword ptr [rax] mov rsi, qword ptr [rcx + 336] movabs rax, offset ijl_type_error mov qword ptr [rbp - 48], rsi call rax .Lfunc_end0: .size julia_part1_1203, .Lfunc_end0-julia_part1_1203 # -- End function .type ".L_j_str_typeassert#1",@object # @"_j_str_typeassert#1" .section .rodata.str1.1,"aMS",@progbits,1 ".L_j_str_typeassert#1": .asciz "typeassert" .size ".L_j_str_typeassert#1", 11 .section ".note.GNU-stack","",@progbits ``` </details> Co-authored-by: Sukera <Seelengrab@users.noreply.github.com>

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible.

@alexfanqi

Rebase and extension of @alexfanqi's initial work on porting Julia to RISC-V. Requires LLVM 19. Tested on a VisionFive2, built with: ```make MARCH := rv64gc_zba_zbb MCPU := sifive-u74 USE_BINARYBUILDER:=0 DEPS_GIT = llvm override LLVM_VER=19.1.1 override LLVM_BRANCH=julia-release/19.x override LLVM_SHA1=julia-release/19.x ``` ```julia-repl ❯ ./julia _ _ _ _(_)_ | Documentation: https://docs.julialang.org (_) | (_) (_) | _ _ _| |_ __ _ | Type "?" for help, "]?" for Pkg help. | | | | | | |/ _` | | | | |_| | | | (_| | | Version 1.12.0-DEV.1374 (2024-10-14) _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_| | riscv/25092a3982* (fork: 1 commits, 0 days) |__/ | julia> versioninfo(; verbose=true) Julia Version 1.12.0-DEV.1374 Commit 25092a3* (2024-10-14 09:57 UTC) Platform Info: OS: Linux (riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu) uname: Linux 6.11.3-1-riscv64 #1 SMP Debian 6.11.3-1 (2024-10-10) riscv64 unknown CPU: unknown: speed user nice sys idle irq #1 1500 MHz 922 s 0 s 265 s 160953 s 0 s #2 1500 MHz 457 s 0 s 280 s 161521 s 0 s #3 1500 MHz 452 s 0 s 270 s 160911 s 0 s #4 1500 MHz 638 s 15 s 301 s 161340 s 0 s Memory: 7.760246276855469 GB (7474.08203125 MB free) Uptime: 16260.13 sec Load Avg: 0.25 0.23 0.1 WORD_SIZE: 64 LLVM: libLLVM-19.1.1 (ORCJIT, sifive-u74) Threads: 1 default, 0 interactive, 1 GC (on 4 virtual cores) Environment: HOME = /home/tim PATH = /home/tim/.local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/games TERM = xterm-256color julia> ccall(:jl_dump_host_cpu, Nothing, ()) CPU: sifive-u74 Features: +zbb,+d,+i,+f,+c,+a,+zba,+m,-zvbc,-zksed,-zvfhmin,-zbkc,-zkne,-zksh,-zfh,-zfhmin,-zknh,-v,-zihintpause,-zicboz,-zbs,-zvknha,-zvksed,-zfa,-ztso,-zbc,-zvknhb,-zihintntl,-zknd,-zvbb,-zbkx,-zkt,-zvkt,-zicond,-zvksh,-zvfh,-zvkg,-zvkb,-zbkb,-zvkned julia> @code_native debuginfo=:none 1+2. .text .attribute 4, 16 .attribute 5, "rv64i2p1_m2p0_a2p1_f2p2_d2p2_c2p0_zicsr2p0_zifencei2p0_zmmul1p0_zba1p0_zbb1p0" .file "+" .globl "julia_+_3003" .p2align 1 .type "julia_+_3003",@function "julia_+_3003": addi sp, sp, -16 sd ra, 8(sp) sd s0, 0(sp) addi s0, sp, 16 fcvt.d.l fa5, a0 ld ra, 8(sp) ld s0, 0(sp) fadd.d fa0, fa5, fa0 addi sp, sp, 16 ret .Lfunc_end0: .size "julia_+_3003", .Lfunc_end0-"julia_+_3003" .type ".L+Core.Float64#3005",@object .section .data.rel.ro,"aw",@progbits .p2align 3, 0x0 ".L+Core.Float64#3005": .quad ".L+Core.Float64#3005.jit" .size ".L+Core.Float64#3005", 8 .set ".L+Core.Float64#3005.jit", 272467692544 .size ".L+Core.Float64#3005.jit", 8 .section ".note.GNU-stack","",@progbits ``` Lots of bugs guaranteed, but with this we at least have a functional build and REPL for further development by whoever is interested. Also requires Linux 6.4+, since the fallback processor detection used here relies on LLVM's `sys::getHostCPUFeatures`, which for RISC-V is implemented using hwprobe introduced in 6.4. We could probably add a fallback that parses `/proc/cpuinfo`, either by building a CPU database much like how we've done for AArch64, or by parsing the actual ISA string contained there. That would probably also be a good place to add support for profiles, which are supposedly the way forward to package RISC-V binaries. That can happen in follow-up PRs though. For now, on older kernels, use the `-C` arg to Julia to specify an ISA. Co-authored-by: Alex Fan <alex.fan.q@gmail.com>

@noinline

E.g. this allows `finalizer` inlining in the following case: ```julia mutable struct ForeignBuffer{T} const ptr::Ptr{T} end const foreign_buffer_finalized = Ref(false) function foreign_alloc(::Type{T}, length) where T ptr = Libc.malloc(sizeof(T) * length) ptr = Base.unsafe_convert(Ptr{T}, ptr) obj = ForeignBuffer{T}(ptr) return finalizer(obj) do obj Base.@assume_effects :notaskstate :nothrow foreign_buffer_finalized[] = true Libc.free(obj.ptr) end end function f_EA_finalizer(N::Int) workspace = foreign_alloc(Float64, N) GC.@preserve workspace begin (;ptr) = workspace Base.@assume_effects :nothrow @noinline println(devnull, "ptr = ", ptr) end end ``` ```julia julia> @code_typed f_EA_finalizer(42) CodeInfo( 1 ── %1 = Base.mul_int(8, N)::Int64 │ %2 = Core.lshr_int(%1, 63)::Int64 │ %3 = Core.trunc_int(Core.UInt8, %2)::UInt8 │ %4 = Core.eq_int(%3, 0x01)::Bool └─── goto #3 if not %4 2 ── invoke Core.throw_inexacterror(:convert::Symbol, UInt64::Type, %1::Int64)::Union{} └─── unreachable 3 ── goto #4 4 ── %9 = Core.bitcast(Core.UInt64, %1)::UInt64 └─── goto #5 5 ── goto #6 6 ── goto #7 7 ── goto #8 8 ── %14 = $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:malloc), Ptr{Nothing}, svec(UInt64), 0, :(:ccall), :(%9), :(%9)))::Ptr{Nothing} └─── goto #9 9 ── %16 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Float64}, %14)::Ptr{Float64} │ %17 = %new(ForeignBuffer{Float64}, %16)::ForeignBuffer{Float64} └─── goto #10 10 ─ %19 = $(Expr(:gc_preserve_begin, :(%17))) │ %20 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ invoke Main.println(Main.devnull::Base.DevNull, "ptr = "::String, %20::Ptr{Float64})::Nothing │ $(Expr(:gc_preserve_end, :(%19))) │ %23 = Main.foreign_buffer_finalized::Base.RefValue{Bool} │ Base.setfield!(%23, :x, true)::Bool │ %25 = Base.getfield(%17, :ptr)::Ptr{Float64} │ %26 = Base.bitcast(Ptr{Nothing}, %25)::Ptr{Nothing} │ $(Expr(:foreigncall, :(:free), Nothing, svec(Ptr{Nothing}), 0, :(:ccall), :(%26), :(%25)))::Nothing └─── return nothing ) => Nothing ``` However, this is still a WIP. Before merging, I want to improve EA's precision a bit and at least fix the test case that is currently marked as `broken`. I also need to check its impact on compiler performance. Additionally, I believe this feature is not yet practical. In particular, there is still significant room for improvement in the following areas: - EA's interprocedural capabilities: currently EA is performed ad-hoc for limited frames because of latency reasons, which significantly reduces its precision in the presence of interprocedural calls. - Relaxing the `:nothrow` check for finalizer inlining: the current algorithm requires `:nothrow`-ness on all paths from the allocation of the mutable struct to its last use, which is not practical for real-world cases. Even when `:nothrow` cannot be guaranteed, auxiliary optimizations such as inserting a `finalize` call after the last use might still be possible (#55990).

ghost assigned StefanKarpinski Apr 27, 2011

StefanKarpinski closed this as completed in 83bd7b1 May 2, 2011

JeffBezanson mentioned this issue Dec 17, 2011

separate LU economy mode #272

Closed

ViralBShah mentioned this issue Mar 16, 2012

WIP: libuv rewrite and Windows port #521

Merged

vtjnash mentioned this issue Mar 17, 2012

build fails at sys.ji #600

Closed

ViralBShah mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2012

Building julia with clang: tests fail #602

Closed

timholy mentioned this issue May 3, 2012

Dispatch method selection (RangeIndex... more specific than Integer?) #795

Closed

kk49 mentioned this issue May 9, 2012

finfer causes segmentation fault #816

Closed

forkandwait mentioned this issue May 12, 2012

Failed build on FreeBSD #829

Closed

6e441f9c mentioned this issue May 30, 2012

Julia segfaults while loading stage0.jl #901

Closed

spott mentioned this issue Jul 16, 2012

problem bootstrapping the sys0.ji file #1052

Closed

dioptre mentioned this issue Jul 30, 2012

error during bootstrap on OS X #1089

Closed

fundamental mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2013

Regression in reload() Results in REPL Hanging #2829

Closed

railskipl mentioned this issue May 3, 2013

Tab-Expansion of Base in REPL causes SIGABRT #2064

Closed

StefanKarpinski mentioned this issue May 3, 2013

throw error if a bare string literal is invalid UTF-8 #10

Closed

JeffBezanson mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2013

Maybe deprecate BigFloat(f::FloatingPoint) constructor #4278

Closed

StefanKarpinski added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2014

test/euler.jl: slightly faster euler #4 algorithm

4463e9f

mathpup pushed a commit to mathpup/julia that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2014

Merge pull request JuliaLang#4 from ivarne/master

0d487eb

Improved do not edit message in helpdb.jl

staticfloat mentioned this issue Jan 18, 2014

Build failure on Fedora #5422

Closed

cmundi mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2014

RFC: Windows CI #6028

Merged

burrowsa pushed a commit to burrowsa/julia that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2014

Merge pull request JuliaLang#4 from JuliaLang/master

ac74a0f

Rebase to f189271

SimonDanisch mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2014

inv(Matrix{Float64}) makes julia exit without any error #6504

Closed

svaksha mentioned this issue May 3, 2014

[openblas] make testall - error in spawn.jl #6728

Closed

turtleslow mentioned this issue May 4, 2014

inv(13x13 Array{Float64,2}) crahes 0.3.0-prerelease #6748

Closed

rhymer mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2014

Julia does not show prompt in Emacs #8580

Closed

ArchRobison mentioned this issue Nov 25, 2014

Enable SLPVectorizer and make it work for tuples #6271

Merged

jameskyle mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2014

Illegal hardware instruction when performing inner products JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl#150

Closed

staticfloat mentioned this issue Dec 18, 2014

Current master does not start on Mac OS 10.10 #9380

Closed

ScottPJones mentioned this issue Apr 24, 2015

Invalid UTF-8 literal strings with leading surrogate character at end of string #10973

Closed

jasonmorton mentioned this issue May 19, 2015

Problems with scaling pmap beyond 6-7 cores #11354

Closed

vchuravy mentioned this issue Dec 2, 2023

GC error on 1.10 #52363

Closed

aplavin mentioned this issue Mar 9, 2024

Method ambiguity error shows irrelevant methods #52469

Closed

Andrew-Milestone mentioned this issue Apr 28, 2024

Error adding NeuralOperators in Julia v1.10.2 #54292

Closed

gbaraldi mentioned this issue Jul 2, 2024

Bump LLVM to v18 #54848

Merged

martin-frbg mentioned this issue Nov 23, 2015

Calling zpotrs_ introduces nans in unrelated results of cpotrf_ with Nehalem kernels OpenMathLib/OpenBLAS#695

Closed

jagot mentioned this issue Oct 9, 2018

WIP: Some improvements for Hermitian operators. SciML/ExponentialUtilities.jl#1

Closed

6 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

string literals: ASCIIString, UTF8String #4

string literals: ASCIIString, UTF8String #4

StefanKarpinski commented Apr 27, 2011

string literals: ASCIIString, UTF8String #4

string literals: ASCIIString, UTF8String #4

Comments

StefanKarpinski commented Apr 27, 2011