Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

datatype: finish layout corrections #43306

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2021
Merged

datatype: finish layout corrections #43306

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2021

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Dec 2, 2021

Fixes #43303

@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit 30fe8cc into master Dec 6, 2021
@vtjnash vtjnash deleted the jn/43303 branch December 6, 2021 18:28
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2021
We still had some discrepancies between what the code thought could be
computed for a layout, and what we actually could compute layout for.
This hopefully makes those two computations now always give the same
answers (with the assistance of the layout cache).

Fixes #43303

(cherry picked from commit 30fe8cc)
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2021
15 tasks
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2021
We still had some discrepancies between what the code thought could be
computed for a layout, and what we actually could compute layout for.
This hopefully makes those two computations now always give the same
answers (with the assistance of the layout cache).

Fixes #43303

(cherry picked from commit 30fe8cc)
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
We still had some discrepancies between what the code thought could be
computed for a layout, and what we actually could compute layout for.
This hopefully makes those two computations now always give the same
answers (with the assistance of the layout cache).

Fixes JuliaLang#43303
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
We still had some discrepancies between what the code thought could be
computed for a layout, and what we actually could compute layout for.
This hopefully makes those two computations now always give the same
answers (with the assistance of the layout cache).

Fixes JuliaLang#43303
@MilesCranmer
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Might be the cause of this? #55076

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Nested parameterised structs fail to propagate bitstypeness in Julia 1.7.0
4 participants