-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix unescaping in global
expressions
#47719
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
simeonschaub
added
backport 1.6
Change should be backported to release-1.6
backport 1.8
Change should be backported to release-1.8
backport 1.9
Change should be backported to release-1.9
bugfix
This change fixes an existing bug
macros
@macros
labels
Nov 27, 2022
simeonschaub
force-pushed
the
sds/global_macroexpand
branch
2 times, most recently
from
November 28, 2022 12:49
329f477
to
6bb7b33
Compare
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly.
simeonschaub
force-pushed
the
sds/global_macroexpand
branch
from
November 28, 2022 12:50
6bb7b33
to
d256cd7
Compare
51 tasks
vtjnash
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2022
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2022
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
26 tasks
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2022
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
78 tasks
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2022
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2022
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2022
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
staticfloat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2022
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2023
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in `global` expressions. Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and destructuring correctly. (cherry picked from commit cc25a13)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 1.6
Change should be backported to release-1.6
bugfix
This change fixes an existing bug
macros
@macros
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes some issues around macro hygiene in
global
expressions.Apparently we always treat l-values in global expressions as being
escaped, but we still need to be careful to handle type annotations and
destructuring correctly.