Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

This PR is to test nanosoldier running sorting benchmarks #47795

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

LilithHafner
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@LilithHafner LilithHafner added the DO NOT MERGE Do not merge this PR! label Dec 4, 2022
@LilithHafner
Copy link
Member Author

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks("sort")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your job failed.

@LilithHafner
Copy link
Member Author

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks("linalg")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your benchmark job has completed - successfully executed benchmarks. A full report can be found here.

@LilithHafner
Copy link
Member Author

I can't reproduce this locally

(jl_18BzHl) pkg> add https://github.com/JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl
     Cloning git-repo `https://github.com/JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl`
 [...]
  11 dependencies successfully precompiled in 28 seconds

julia> using BaseBenchmarks

julia> BaseBenchmarks.load!("sort");

julia> run(BaseBenchmarks.SUITE)
1-element BenchmarkTools.BenchmarkGroup:
  tags: []
  "sort" => 4-element BenchmarkTools.BenchmarkGroup:
          tags: []
          "insertionsort" => 32-element BenchmarkTools.BenchmarkGroup:
                  tags: []
                  ("sort! forwards", "ones") => Trial(146.740 μs)
                  ("sortperm reverse", "ascending") => Trial(1.222 s)
                  ("sort forwards", "random") => Trial(1.046 s)
                  ("sortperm! forwards", "ascending") => Trial(103.755 μs)
                  ("sort forwards", "descending") => Trial(848.311 ms)
                  ("sort! forwards", "random") => Trial(1.092 s)
                  ("sortperm forwards", "random") => Trial(4.208 s)
                  ("sortperm forwards", "ascending") => Trial(142.864 μs)
                  ("sort reverse", "descending") => Trial(76.990 μs)
                  ("sort! reverse", "descending") => Trial(53.025 μs)
                  

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

Is it just sort that Nanosoldier is having trouble with?

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks("sort")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your job failed.

@maleadt
Copy link
Member

maleadt commented Dec 5, 2022

Yes, see #47788 (comment)

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL)

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your job failed.

@LilithHafner
Copy link
Member Author

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks("sort")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Your benchmark job has completed - successfully executed benchmarks. A full report can be found here.

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the lh/compare-put-back-original-quicksort branch December 14, 2022 02:28
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge removed the DO NOT MERGE Do not merge this PR! label Dec 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants