Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Basis number system swap #205

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member

The solution of #204 we discussed today. The code seems to work locally but maybe documentation needs to be updated a bit more.

@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran added the Ready-for-Review A label for pull requests that are feature-ready label Sep 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.90%. Comparing base (30d587b) to head (082b592).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #205      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.90%   99.90%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        3302     3301       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         3299     3298       -1     
  Misses          3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

src/bases.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kellertuer
Copy link
Member

You were right today, a few things seem to indeed get nicer. Can you also check how much actually breaks with Manifolds.jl downstream?

@kellertuer
Copy link
Member

In general I can check how well this is described in the docs page about bases and improve that somewhen tomorrow.

Co-authored-by: Ronny Bergmann <git@ronnybergmann.net>
@mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member Author

You were right today, a few things seem to indeed get nicer. Can you also check how much actually breaks with Manifolds.jl downstream?

Sure, I will make another PR to Manifolds.jl with adjustments.

In general I can check how well this is described in the docs page about bases and improve that somewhen tomorrow.

Thanks!

@kellertuer
Copy link
Member

Besides the type of real coefficients being complex (see point above) this in general looks good to me.

@mateuszbaran
Copy link
Member Author

OK, I've addressed that issue.

NEWS.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mateuszbaran mateuszbaran merged commit 7b52f31 into master Oct 4, 2024
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready-for-Review A label for pull requests that are feature-ready
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants