Bump dependencies. #309
Bump dependencies. #309
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #309 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.74% 99.74%
=======================================
Files 77 76 -1
Lines 7090 7090
=======================================
Hits 7072 7072
Misses 18 18
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
Hm, this might be more complicated than I thought, since RecursiveArrays are a dependency of Manifolds but only a weak dependency of ManifoldsBAse, so the alternating gradient can actually not be moved out I think – and if so only into another weak dependency with RecursiveArrays since I need the ArrayPartition? But I also get error messages slightly longer than Thomas Mann novels when anything in an Extension fails, so those are super hard to read. |
|
Yes, right, you can't just move the methods that require |
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Baran <mateuszbaran89@gmail.com>
…lds/Manopt.jl into kellertuer/bump-dependencies
…to be able to render documentation locally when not having quarot installed.
…angelog.md on PRs.
kellertuer
added
the
Ready-for-Review
|
I think we could also add changelog to docs like in Manifolds.jl. |
Co-authored-by: Mateusz Baran <mateuszbaran89@gmail.com>
|
Yes, I can do that tomorrow morning. |
…lds/Manopt.jl into kellertuer/bump-dependencies
To ManifoldsBase.jl 0.15 and Manifolds.jl 0.9