Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test_inverse #2

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 11, 2021
Merged

Add test_inverse #2

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 11, 2021

Conversation

devmotion
Copy link
Member

This PR adds InverseFunctions.test_inverse which can be used to check the implementation of inverse.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2 (be4d3be) into master (3e8a3eb) will decrease coverage by 4.76%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##            master       #2      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   95.23%   -4.77%     
===========================================
  Files            1        2       +1     
  Lines           15       21       +6     
===========================================
+ Hits            15       20       +5     
- Misses           0        1       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/inverse.jl 93.33% <ø> (-6.67%) ⬇️
src/test.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3e8a3eb...be4d3be. Read the comment docs.

test/test_inverse.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
Project.toml Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
@oschulz oschulz merged commit fca5de0 into JuliaMath:master Oct 11, 2021
@oschulz
Copy link
Collaborator

oschulz commented Oct 11, 2021

@devmotion I patched most of your improvements in #1 and #2 over to ChangesOfVariables (no interface test function yet, though).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants