Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version: LazyArrays v2.1.9 #111245

Merged

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: 5078a376-72f3-5289-bfd5-ec5146d43c02
Repo: https://github.com/JuliaArrays/LazyArrays.jl.git
Tree: b8ea0abe6cc872996e87356951d286d25d485aba

Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
JuliaRegistrator referenced this pull request in JuliaArrays/LazyArrays.jl Jul 17, 2024
* Implement inv(TriangularLayout) properly

* Support ranges
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅

Your new version registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged in the next round.

2. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot merged commit 2e11171 into master Jul 17, 2024
17 checks passed
@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot deleted the registrator-lazyarrays-5078a376-v2.1.9-6622d41778 branch July 17, 2024 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants