Fix weird juxtaposition syntax in tests #33
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This doesn't change the library, and tests will still fail for unrelated reeasons. But would it help the JuliaSyntax testing if I make a new release anyway? |
|
Thanks for asking! It would certainly be nice, but it's not critical to have a new release - there's a handfull of other libs in General which have similar issues, several of which seem abandoned by their authors at this point... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found as part of testing for JuliaLang/julia#46372 - JuliaSyntax.jl rejects this - it's more consistent about disallowing string juxtaposition with all keywords than the reference parser.