-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct R² formulas and add Efron's R² #400
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
89f9860
Corrected R² formulas and added Efron's R²
lbittarello 0b27eb3
Fixes
lbittarello ef14acb
Fixes
lbittarello a369a31
Deprecated default r² for linear models
lbittarello f5d5550
Remove empty line
nalimilan fe20386
Fixes
lbittarello 7b40de8
Drop Efron's R²
lbittarello File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't these take into accounts weights since weights would have been handled in
mss
anddeviance
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. That also applies to the Efron R². For the method above, since it's deprecated, we'd better keep using
deviance
for now. For the Efron R², I guess we need to multiply observations by their weights, but will it work for all kinds of models?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Precisely: packages can handle weights through
mss(obj)
andloglikelihood(obj)
. There's no need to provide for weights here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure for
ProbabilityWeights
, but should work fine for the other weights supported if not mistaken. The tests should cover the weight cases for sure.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Efron's R² does need special treatment, since it uses the sum of residuals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think so. How are we going to implement it? We can retrieve weights via
weights
, but how do we check if weights were defined in the first place?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the default is just a one array. Might be nice to follow FillArrays.jl for it to implement the UnitWeight or something.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's call
weights
and assume it returns a validAbstractVector
. Then it would make sense to defineUnitWeights
in this package, to complement other kinds of weights (#135).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bump. Can you drop the Efron R² for now so that we can merge the PR? We can discuss improvements later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since #515 we have
UnitWeights
, so we can require models to return this when they are unweighted.