Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes #8116 - correcting prior env description in apidoc, BZ 1130258 #4768

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2014
Merged

fixes #8116 - correcting prior env description in apidoc, BZ 1130258 #4768

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2014

Conversation

komidore64
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

param :prior, String, :required => true, :desc => <<-DESC
Name of an environment that is prior to the new environment in the chain. It has to be
param :prior, Integer, :required => true, :desc => <<-DESC
ID of an environment that is prior to the new environment in the chain. It has to be
either 'Library' or an environment at the end of a chain.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The description here could lead a user to think that they need to pass "Library" in some cases instead of the ID of the Library. Mind adjusting that to mention such?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, yes. you're right.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

boom reworded.

@ehelms
Copy link
Member

ehelms commented Oct 29, 2014

ACK

komidore64 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2014
fixes #8116 - correcting prior env description in apidoc, BZ 1130258
@komidore64 komidore64 merged commit 511ddce into Katello:master Oct 29, 2014
@komidore64 komidore64 deleted the rmi8116-apidoc-lc-env-prior-id branch October 29, 2014 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants