-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 248
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fluid] Fine grained Python solvers #6575
Merged
Merged
Changes from 46 commits
Commits
Show all changes
48 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
96e5fb4
Base solver
rubenzorrilla e2ab850
Working monolithic and FS solvers
rubenzorrilla d5035d1
Serial solvers working
rubenzorrilla ac17ab4
Remove old steady solver
rubenzorrilla 2caacb2
Serial solvers clean up
rubenzorrilla 889a4f2
MPI solvers (testing is pending)
rubenzorrilla aec2a26
Merge branch 'master' into fluid/fine-grained-initialize
rubenzorrilla 17159d8
Adding missing Trilinos scheme
rubenzorrilla b98d832
Fix name mangling
rubenzorrilla 3014ff8
Minor
rubenzorrilla e06ca98
Using AMGCL as default linear solver
rubenzorrilla 7ff8119
Using self.__class__.__name__
rubenzorrilla 11fc9ab
Adjoint solvers
rubenzorrilla aebc95d
Chimera solvers
rubenzorrilla bd58e39
Minor correction
rubenzorrilla 255f2cc
Potential flow solvers
rubenzorrilla 9e3900e
Using getters, main model part and adding missing initialize
marcnunezc 6ba1b9c
Merge branch 'master' into fluid/fine-grained-initialize
rubenzorrilla a7152df
Adding @classmethod decorators to potential flow solvers
rubenzorrilla 7f4ab1a
changes to chimera app to solve test failures
adityaghantasala 060d974
add detailed optional output
adityaghantasala 6400308
Merge branch 'fluid/fine-grained-initialize' of https://github.com/Kr…
adityaghantasala e69bc08
codecy spaces
adityaghantasala a82e8fe
Using computing_model_part and adapting test jsons
marcnunezc 7f4d93e
Merge branch 'fluid/fine-grained-initialize' of https://github.com/Kr…
marcnunezc 414db10
Merge branch 'master' into fluid/fine-grained-initialize
rubenzorrilla a8c6105
solution_scheme to scheme
rubenzorrilla 96c1616
Update applications/FluidDynamicsApplication/python_scripts/fluid_sol…
rubenzorrilla 8f06292
Merge branch 'master' into fluid/fine-grained-initialize
rubenzorrilla da89039
FM-ALE DOFs message
rubenzorrilla d1d5144
Follow style guide
rubenzorrilla 78be497
More code review and Codacy
rubenzorrilla f0e3e1c
Update applications/FluidDynamicsApplication/python_scripts/trilinos_…
rubenzorrilla 9dddf45
Update applications/FluidDynamicsApplication/python_scripts/trilinos_…
rubenzorrilla 3b44eec
Update applications/FluidDynamicsApplication/python_scripts/trilinos_…
rubenzorrilla 000dca5
Merge branch 'master' into fluid/fine-grained-initialize
rubenzorrilla d8be320
change mpi solver tolerance
sunethwarna 726aefc
Merge branch 'fluid/fine-grained-initialize' of https://github.com/Kr…
sunethwarna 95cf8c8
adding comment
sunethwarna 017d37f
Check restart
rubenzorrilla 110943b
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/KratosMultiphysics/Kratos…
adityaghantasala d59aeeb
Merge branch 'master' into fluid/fine-grained-initialize
rubenzorrilla b7b6858
@philbucher suggestions
rubenzorrilla d758736
Missing aux Darcy test solver change
rubenzorrilla 6213eee
Merge branch 'master' into fluid/fine-grained-initialize
philbucher 339612d
fixing NavierStokesAleFluidSolver
philbucher 2f7b4ca
Potential flow style guide
rubenzorrilla f65a3ae
Merge branch 'fluid/fine-grained-initialize' of https://github.com/Kr…
rubenzorrilla File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@adityaghantasala Just for me to know. Why do you need the
main_model_part
? It is because it contains both the background mesh and the patches?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not exactly. I need to use the
main_model_part
because the constraints are added on this modelpart andcomputing_model_part
does not know anything about them.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mmmm now I see. Do you think we should add them to the computing model part too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the current impelementations, not necessary. But as I remember that computing modelpart is set to be removed in future no ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the structure. It is required to have it in the fluid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it really required in FluidApp ? If not we can also try to remove it !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I discussed this many times with @jcotela, he said it is not possible to remove it
Not sure if this has changed