You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be useful to support loading the build_likelihood factory from python packages, rather than file names.
For example, to support usage like firecrownIni: desc_baryon_challenge.likelihoods.firecrown_likelihood.
Or maybe better more explicitly: firecrown_likelihood_factory: desc_baryon_challenge.likelihoods.firecrown_likelihood.build_likelihood
With the option to pass build_parameters, this should allow quite generic likelihood factories that can be shipped centrally in a python package.
It would be useful to support loading the
build_likelihood
factory from python packages, rather than file names.For example, to support usage like
firecrownIni: desc_baryon_challenge.likelihoods.firecrown_likelihood
.Or maybe better more explicitly:
firecrown_likelihood_factory: desc_baryon_challenge.likelihoods.firecrown_likelihood.build_likelihood
With the option to pass
build_parameters
, this should allow quite generic likelihood factories that can be shipped centrally in a python package.A specific use case is the baryon challenge: https://github.com/LSSTDESC/baryon-challenge/blob/main/src/desc_baryon_challenge/likelihoods/firecrown_likelihood.py
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: