Improve compatibility with Python <3.10 #2
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Haven't run full compatibility tests, but this was a definite 3.10 only syntax, and 3.8/3.9 are still used wide enough that it's worth such a small change.
fangpenlin
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2022
|
Just realized that my poetry file still using 3.9 as the minimal python version, I will change that as well. wtforms-bootstrap5/pyproject.toml Line 11 in db5f292 |
@fangpenlin Thanks for fixing this! I see it was released on github but does not seem to have made it to PyPI? That's still on 0.1.3 as latest. |
|
@mxsasha thanks for the heads up. yeah, turned out last time I forgot to bump the version number in poetry file and CI job for pushing the package to pypi as old release already exists. I've fixed that issue and published a new release 0.1.6, and it's available on PyPi now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Haven't run full compatibility tests, but this was a definite 3.10 only syntax, and 3.8/3.9 are still used wide enough that it's worth such a small change.