improve: update InfoLM class to dynamically set higher_is_better

[grahamannett]

…ed on information_measure

What does this PR do?

Fixes #2659

Before submitting

• Was this discussed/agreed via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
• Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
• Did you make sure to update the docs?
• Did you write any new necessary tests?

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

I had problems with the devcontainer and the environment.

Might try and add tests for this but it seems the devcontainer uses the torchmetrics in /usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages (or similar depending on python) and its not obvious to me how you are supposed to setup things to easily/quickly add tests? I ended up just doing editable install.

I manually checked all the values but if I add a test ill try and include some info/example for each of these that shows the metric output on strs.

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://torchmetrics--2674.org.readthedocs.build/en/2674/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39%. Comparing base (79b33ce) to head (af2b87e).
Report is 105 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (79b33ce) and HEAD (af2b87e). Click for more details.

HEAD has 80 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (79b33ce)	HEAD (af2b87e)
Windows	6	3
python3.8	6	3
cpu	40	20
torch1.13.1+cpu	6	3
torch1.12.1+cpu	2	1
Linux	26	13
python3.9	18	9
torch1.11.0+cpu	2	1
torch1.10.2+cpu	2	1
macOS	8	4
python3.11	6	3
torch2.4.0	2	1
torch2.4.0+cpu	2	1
python3.10	10	5
torch2.0.1	4	2
torch2.0.1+cpu	6	3
torch2.3.1+cpu	4	2
torch2.2.2+cpu	4	2
torch2.1.2+cpu	2	1
torch1.13.1	2	1
torch2.4.0+cu121	2	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #2674     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage      69%     39%    -30%     
========================================
  Files         316     316             
  Lines       17897   17900      +3     
========================================
- Hits        12325    7027   -5298     
- Misses       5572   10873   +5301     

[grahamannett]

Im still not sure where to put the info that was requested for the higher is better but incorporated the changes asked for the @propertyrelated bit. if you can outline/direct what you would like I will incorporate the changes but seems likely the ways I would decide to implement it/where to store the info isnt what @Borda wants

[SkafteNicki]

@Borda can you give more specific instructions on what you want changed here?

[SkafteNicki]

@Borda should be good to go now