Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Clarify communication pathways #742

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 7, 2021

Conversation

tsalo
Copy link
Member

@tsalo tsalo commented Jul 6, 2021

Closes #478.

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • Add section in Support and Communication page on how and when each of the established communication pathways should be used.

@tsalo tsalo requested review from emdupre and jbteves July 6, 2021 18:38
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 6, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #742 (965979d) into main (8aeadcc) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 965979d differs from pull request most recent head fc2d089. Consider uploading reports for the commit fc2d089 to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #742   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.65%   92.65%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        2137     2137           
=======================================
  Hits         1980     1980           
  Misses        157      157           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8aeadcc...fc2d089. Read the comment docs.

@jbteves
Copy link
Collaborator

jbteves commented Jul 6, 2021

This looks good. Do we want to include a link to our newsletter repo, however?

eurunuela
eurunuela previously approved these changes Jul 7, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@eurunuela eurunuela left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks Taylor!

docs/support.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/support.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/support.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Eneko Uruñuela <13706448+eurunuela@users.noreply.github.com>
@tsalo
Copy link
Member Author

tsalo commented Jul 7, 2021

Cancelling the integration tests because this only impacts the documentation. I'll use my admin privileges to merge once I have the necessary reviews.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jbteves jbteves left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @tsalo !

@tsalo tsalo merged commit 4f4e5dc into ME-ICA:main Jul 7, 2021
@tsalo tsalo deleted the communication-pathways branch July 7, 2021 21:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarify communication methods for tedana
3 participants