Add missing fcio functions to LLVM-MOS build #56
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The commodore targets on llvm-mos has gained stdio support which now enables the missing features in fcio. Note though that the llvm-mos stdio is largely untested on mega65 and things might not work. This should eventually be fixed but in llvm-mos, not in mega65-libc.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
LLVM-MOS now has stdio support which enables the missing features in fcio on clang. Note that llvm-mos stdio is largely untested on the mega65 target and things might not work. This should eventually be fixed in llvm-mos-sdk, not in mega65-libc.
This fails on CI due to missing asm clobber fix which has not made it intomasterbranch.Checklist
Thanks a lot for your contribution!
Please tick off the following:
make test)clang-format -i <file>