Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replicate "Internal notes" functionality for managing project reviews #2258

Open
tompollard opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@tompollard
Copy link
Member

tompollard commented Jul 17, 2024

We could consider replicating the "internal notes" functionality that was introduced in #2255 as a simple first step towards implementing peer review functionality.

i.e. We would add a "Reviews" tab to the editorial tools page for Active Projects, like this:

Screenshot 2024-07-17 at 7 26 20 PM

Initially project editors would need to request reviews via email and then post the reviews on behalf of reviewers. We could then work towards more complete peer review functionality by:

  1. Allowing PhysioNet users to post reviews to a project upon invitation.
  2. Allowing PhysioNet editors to send email invitations to reviewers
  3. Introducing an "Awaiting reviews" step to the editorial workflow (between "Awaiting Editor Assignment" and "Awaiting Decision") that would encourage editors to seek external reviewers on all submissions.

@bemoody @lilehman Please let me know your thoughts.

We can implement Step 1 very quickly if you agree this is a good direction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant