[Backoffice] Correction des champs du backoffice #3014
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes encompass a comprehensive revamp of the frontend components related to regulation management in the backoffice system. From refining selection and interaction logic to introducing novel components for an enhanced user experience, these updates aim to streamline the process of creating and editing regulations. Moreover, adjustments in the fleet segment features improve data handling and form interactions, contributing to a more robust and user-friendly system. Changes
Poem
🌟🐰 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 10
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (48)
- backend/src/main/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepository.kt (2 hunks)
- backend/src/test/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepositoryITests.kt (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/fleet_segments.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (6 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/update_regulation.spec.ts (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/api/APIWorker.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/domain/use_cases/vessel/getFleetSegments.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/ConfirmRegulationModal.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx (6 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/DayTimeCheckbox.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/FishingPeriodForm.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/gear_regulation/RegulatedGears.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/CreateRegulationTopicForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/index.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryText.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryTextSection.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/tableCells.jsx (7 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/ControlObjective/components/ControlObjectiveTable/SeaFrontControlObjectives.tsx (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/apis.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/CreateOrEditFleetSegmentModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/FleetSegmentsTable.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/schema.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/types.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/addFleetSegmentYear.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/createFleetSegment.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/deleteFleetSegment.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/getFleetSegmentsYearEntries.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/updateFleetSegment.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/FleetSegments.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/FleetSegmentsField.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/VesselFleetSegmentsField.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/hooks/useGetMissionActionFormikUsecases.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Regulation/slice.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/SideWindow/MissionList/FilterBar.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/VesselList/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Backoffice.style.tsx (9 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Buttons.style.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/router.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/ui/LegacyRsuiteComponentsWrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 72
frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/getFleetSegmentsYearEntries.ts (2)
- 1-1: The import path for
getFleetSegmentYearEntriesFromAPIhas been updated to use a more structured approach, aligning with the project's new module structure. This change should improve code maintainability and clarity.- 3-3: The import path for
setErrorhas been updated to reflect the new project structure. Ensure that all references to this function across the project have been updated accordingly to prevent any unresolved imports.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/addFleetSegmentYear.ts (2)
- 1-1: The import path for
addFleetSegmentYearFromAPIhas been updated to align with the new module structure. This is a positive change for code organization and clarity.- 4-4: The import path for
setErrorhas been adjusted. It's important to verify that all usages ofsetErroracross the project have been updated to this new path to maintain consistency and prevent import errors.Verification successful
The verification process confirms that the import path for
setErrorhas been updated across the project to the new path as mentioned. All usages ofsetErrorfound in the project are using the updated import path, ensuring consistency and preventing import errors.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining old import paths for setError. rg --type ts "domain/shared_slices/Global"Length of output: 4704
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/index.jsx (1)
- 1-9: The removal of several imports (
RegulationLawTypeLine,RegulationTopicLine,RegulationRegionLine,RegulationLayerZoneLine, andRegulatoryText) and retention of others (RegulationGeometryLineandRegulatoryTextSection) suggest a refactoring effort to simplify the regulation editing components. Ensure that the removed components are no longer needed and that their functionalities are either obsolete or have been integrated elsewhere in the application.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/schema.ts (1)
- 3-13: The introduction of
FLEET_SEGMENT_FORM_SCHEMAusingyupfor form validation is a good practice for ensuring data integrity and providing user feedback. The schema covers a comprehensive range of fields relevant to fleet segments. Pay special attention to thesegmentfield's custom transform function to ensure it behaves as expected in all use cases, particularly with edge cases involving whitespace.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/deleteFleetSegment.ts (3)
- 1-1: The update to the import path for
deleteFleetSegmentFromAPIaligns with the project's new module structure, which should help in maintaining a clean and organized codebase.- 3-3: The updated import path for
setErroris consistent with the project's restructuring efforts. It's crucial to ensure that all references tosetErrorare updated to prevent any import errors.Verification successful
The verification process confirms that the import path for
setErrorhas been updated consistently across the project, in line with the restructuring efforts. All references tosetErrorand related functions fromdomain/shared_slices/Globalare correctly updated, as shown in the provided script output. There are no indications of missed or incorrectly updated references.* 5-5: The import path for the `FleetSegment` type has been updated, which is part of the project's reorganization. Ensure that all type references across the project are consistent with this new path.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that all references to setError have been updated. rg --type ts "domain/shared_slices/Global"Length of output: 4704
Verification successful
The extensive search across the project for the usage of the
FleetSegmenttype has revealed consistent usage of the updated import path@features/FleetSegment/typesin all TypeScript files where theFleetSegmenttype is imported or referenced. This confirms that the project's reorganization concerning theFleetSegmenttype has been successfully applied across the codebase, ensuring that all type references are consistent with the new path.Based on the provided script output, there are no instances where the
FleetSegmenttype is imported from an outdated or incorrect path. All references to theFleetSegmenttype use the updated path, aligning with the project's reorganization efforts.Given this information, it can be concluded that the review comment regarding the update of the import path for the
FleetSegmenttype and the need to ensure consistency across the project has been successfully verified.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistency in FleetSegment type usage across the project. rg --type ts "@features/FleetSegment/types"Length of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any import or usage of FleetSegment type across TypeScript files to ensure no old paths are used. rg --type ts "FleetSegment"Length of output: 41521
frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/types.ts (1)
- 1-23: The definition of
FleetSegmentandUpdateFleetSegmenttypes is clear and comprehensive, covering all necessary fields for managing fleet segments. The use of| undefinedfor optional fields is appropriate, ensuring flexibility in data handling. Ensure that these types are consistently used across the project where fleet segment data is manipulated or displayed.frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/utils.ts (1)
- 4-4: The update to the import path for the
FleetSegmenttype from@features/FleetSegment/typesis a positive change, ensuring that type definitions are centralized and consistent across the project. This should facilitate easier maintenance and updates to type definitions in the future.frontend/src/domain/use_cases/vessel/getFleetSegments.ts (2)
- 1-1: The update to the import path for
fleetSegmentApialigns with the project's efforts to reorganize and consolidate its structure. This should improve the clarity and maintainability of the codebase.- 3-3: The import path for the
FleetSegmenttype has been updated to reflect the project's new structure. It's important to ensure that this type is consistently used across the project to maintain type safety and clarity.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/utils.ts (1)
- 22-29: The function
checkNameAndUrlcorrectly checks for missing or invalidreferenceandurlvalues. The use ofcheckURLfor URL validation is a good practice. However, consider adding a comment explaining the expected format forurlto improve maintainability.Consider adding a comment detailing the expected URL format that
checkURLvalidates against, to improve code readability and maintainability.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/createFleetSegment.ts (2)
- 1-5: The reorganization of import paths for
createFleetSegmentFromAPI,setError, and typesFleetSegment,UpdateFleetSegmentaligns with the PR's objective of enhancing maintainability through a more structured module system.- 1-8: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-36]
The
createFleetSegmentfunction correctly implements the creation logic for a fleet segment, including validation of required fields and error handling. The use of async/await for asynchronous operations and dispatching errors to a global error handler are good practices.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/updateFleetSegment.ts (2)
- 1-5: The adjustments to import paths for
updateFleetSegmentFromAPI,setError, and typesFleetSegment,UpdateFleetSegmentare consistent with the PR's goal of improving code structure and maintainability.- 1-8: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-40]
The
updateFleetSegmentfunction properly handles the update logic, including validation and error handling. The use of async/await and dispatching errors to a global error handler are consistent with best practices.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/DayTimeCheckbox.tsx (3)
- 1-4: The import statements are well-organized, and the use of absolute paths for hooks and components from the project's own modules aligns with best practices for maintainability and readability.
- 10-31: The
DayTimeCheckboxcomponent correctly implements the checkbox logic, including disabling the checkbox based on props and updating the state accordingly. The use ofuseEffectto reset the state when the checkbox is disabled is a good practice.- 34-36: The styled component
StyledCheckboxis correctly defined and applies a margin style. This is a good use of styled-components for encapsulating and reusing styles.frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/FleetSegments.tsx (2)
- 2-9: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-6]
The update to the import path for
useGetFleetSegmentsQueryfrom a relative to an absolute path enhances the readability and maintainability of the code by making dependencies clearer.
- 6-6: The
FleetSegmentscomponent correctly fetches and displays fleet segments using theuseGetFleetSegmentsQueryhook. The use of a utility function to process segments and the conditional rendering based on the presence of segments are well-implemented.frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/utils.ts (2)
- 1-1: The update to the import path for the
FleetSegmenttype aligns with the PR's objective of improving code structure and maintainability by using more organized and consistent paths.- 1-1: The utility functions
getTripSegmentsandgetSegmentInfoare well-implemented, providing clear and efficient logic for processing and displaying fleet segment information. The use of optional chaining and conditional rendering based on the presence of segment properties are good practices.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx (2)
- 1-4: The import statements are well-organized, and the use of absolute paths for hooks and components from the project's own modules aligns with best practices for maintainability and readability.
- 13-42: The
RegulationLayerZoneLinecomponent correctly implements the text input logic, including updating the state based on user input. The use ofuseBackofficeAppDispatchanduseBackofficeAppSelectorfor state management and dispatching actions is consistent with Redux best practices.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx (2)
- 1-4: The import statements are well-organized, and the use of absolute paths for hooks and components from the project's own modules aligns with best practices for maintainability and readability.
- 11-43: The
RegulationLawTypeLinecomponent correctly implements the select input logic, including updating the state based on user selection. The use ofuseBackofficeAppDispatchanduseBackofficeAppSelectorfor state management and dispatching actions is consistent with Redux best practices. The conditional logic for clearing the region based on the law type selection is a thoughtful addition.frontend/src/router.tsx (2)
- 1-10: The import paths have been updated to reflect the new structure of the project. This is a good practice for maintaining clarity and organization as the project evolves.
- 65-65: Replacing
FleetSegmentswithFleetSegmentsBackofficein the route configuration aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing backoffice functionalities. Ensure that all references and dependencies related toFleetSegmentsare updated accordingly.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
FleetSegmentsis still referenced in various parts of the codebase, particularly within theFleetSegmentfeature directory and its use cases, components, and API calls. These references are appropriate and expected, as they pertain to the functionality and operations related to fleet segments within the application. The replacement ofFleetSegmentswithFleetSegmentsBackofficein the route configuration, as mentioned in the review comment, seems to be a specific change aimed at enhancing backoffice functionalities. The presence ofFleetSegmentsin other parts of the code does not contradict the PR objectives but rather indicates thatFleetSegmentsandFleetSegmentsBackofficemay serve different purposes within the application.Given the context and the search results, it can be concluded that the replacement of
FleetSegmentswithFleetSegmentsBackofficein the route configuration is aligned with enhancing backoffice functionalities, and the continued use ofFleetSegmentsin other parts of the codebase is appropriate for their respective functionalities.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that FleetSegments is no longer used elsewhere inappropriately rg --type tsx "FleetSegments" --vimgrepLength of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that FleetSegments is no longer used elsewhere inappropriately by searching all files rg "FleetSegments" --vimgrepLength of output: 30692
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx (2)
- 1-4: Refactoring imports to use more specific paths improves modularity and makes the codebase easier to navigate. Good job on organizing these imports.
- 39-57: The logic for displaying tags and icons based on conditions is clear and concise. Using conditional rendering to toggle between the
Icon.HideandIcon.Displayicons is a neat approach.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/ConfirmRegulationModal.jsx (2)
- 16-17: Simplifying the
savefunction to directly dispatch actions without usingbatchmakes the code cleaner. However, ensure that this change does not affect the transactional integrity of the actions if they were intended to be batched for a reason.- 16-17: Removing the dispatch of
setRegulationModifiedin theclosefunction could impact the application's state management, particularly if other components rely on this state to determine modifications. Verify that this change aligns with the intended behavior.frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Buttons.style.jsx (1)
- 104-105: Changing the dimensions of the
SquareButtoncomponent from 34x34 to 30x30 pixels could affect the UI's consistency and alignment. Verify that this change aligns with the design specifications and does not introduce visual regressions in places whereSquareButtonis used.frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/hooks/useGetMissionActionFormikUsecases.ts (1)
- 2-2: The import path for
useGetFleetSegmentsQueryhas been updated to reflect the new module structure. This change aligns with the PR objectives of reorganizing import paths to support a cleaner and more maintainable codebase.frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/VesselFleetSegmentsField.tsx (1)
- 1-1: The import path for
useGetFleetSegmentsQueryhas been updated to reflect the new module structure. This change aligns with the PR objectives of reorganizing import paths to support a cleaner and more maintainable codebase.backend/src/main/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepository.kt (1)
- 57-59: The addition of the operation to update the segment before other fields in the
updatemethod ensures better consistency in database operations. This change is crucial for maintaining data integrity when updating fleet segments.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/apis.ts (1)
- 1-2: The reorganization of imports and adjustments to import paths for
ApiErrorand types related toFleetSegmentalign with the PR objectives of updating import paths to reflect the new project structure. This change supports a cleaner and more maintainable codebase.frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Backoffice.style.tsx (1)
- 1-1: The addition of imports for
CheckboxandRadioGroupfrom 'rsuite' indicates the use of these components in the backoffice styling. This change aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the backoffice's functionality and usability.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/FishingPeriodForm.jsx (1)
- 10-10: The update to the import statement for
DayTimeCheckboxto use named import syntax aligns with the PR objectives of ensuring consistency and maintainability in the codebase.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx (1)
- 1-4: The updates to import paths in
RegulationTopicLine.tsxreflect the new module structure and align with the PR objectives of reorganizing import paths to support a cleaner and more maintainable codebase.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/CreateOrEditFleetSegmentModal.tsx (4)
- 1-7: Consider organizing imports to improve readability. Grouping imports (e.g., library imports, local imports) can make the code easier to navigate.
- 32-47: The
useMemohook is used to defineinitialValuesfor the form. Ensure that all dependencies of this memoization are correctly listed in the dependency array to avoid stale closures.- 64-117: The modal component and its children are well-structured. However, consider extracting large blocks of JSX into smaller, reusable components for improved readability and maintainability.
- 121-147: Styled components are defined at the bottom of the file. This is a common practice, but ensure that these components are not overly specific to this file if they have potential for reuse in other parts of the application.
frontend/src/api/APIWorker.tsx (1)
- 1-1: The import of
fleetSegmentApifrom@features/FleetSegment/apisreplaces a redundant local import. This change centralizes API calls and promotes code reuse. Ensure that the new import path is correctly referenced throughout the project.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryText.tsx (5)
- 1-11: The imports are well-organized, and the use of relative paths for local imports is consistent. Ensure that all necessary dependencies are imported.
- 14-20: The component's prop types are documented using JSDoc comments, which is good practice. However, consider using TypeScript for stronger type safety and better developer experience.
- 33-43: The
setfunction defined withuseCallbackcorrectly lists its dependencies. Ensure that this pattern is consistently used for all callback hooks to avoid unnecessary re-renders.- 88-194: The component renders a form for editing regulatory texts. While the structure is clear, consider breaking down the component into smaller, reusable components to improve readability and maintainability.
- 197-217: Styled components are defined at the bottom of the file. This is a common practice, but ensure that these components are not overly specific to this file if they have potential for reuse in other parts of the application.
backend/src/test/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepositoryITests.kt (1)
- 61-61: The addition of the
segmentNameparameter to theupdatemethod in the test reflects the changes in the repository's method signature. Ensure that all tests accurately test the functionality of the updated method.frontend/src/features/SideWindow/MissionList/FilterBar.tsx (1)
- 226-226: Exporting the
OptionValuestyled component allows for reuse in other parts of the application. This is a good practice for promoting consistency and reducing code duplication.frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/fleet_segments.spec.ts (4)
- 17-91: The test scenario "Should list and update fleet segments" has been updated to include detailed steps for updating a fleet segment, including filling out various fields and verifying the update through assertions. This comprehensive approach ensures that the update functionality is thoroughly tested. However, it's important to ensure that the test data used (e.g., segment names, impact notes) does not conflict with existing data in the test environment to avoid flaky tests.
- 93-144: The test scenario "Should create a new fleet segment and delete it" effectively tests the creation and deletion functionalities. It's crucial to verify that the deletion step properly cleans up any data created during the test to maintain a clean state for subsequent tests. Additionally, consider adding assertions to confirm the absence of the deleted segment in the UI after deletion, enhancing the robustness of the test.
- 148-156: The test "Should show previous year fleet segments" correctly verifies the functionality to view fleet segments from the previous year. Ensure that the test environment has predictable data for the previous year to make this test reliable. It might be beneficial to include setup steps that ensure the presence of known data for the previous year if the test environment allows for such manipulation.
- 163-170: The test "Should add a new year based on current year" checks the functionality to add and view fleet segments for a new year. This test is important for verifying that the system can handle data across different years. It's recommended to verify that the newly added year does not already exist in the system before running this test to avoid potential conflicts or false positives.
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/tableCells.jsx (3)
- 117-129: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [120-142]
The
ControlPriorityCellcomponent has been updated to useSelectPickerinstead ofInputPicker. This change likely enhances the user experience by providing a more appropriate UI element for selecting control priorities. Ensure that theSelectPickercomponent is properly configured to match the expected data structure and behavior of the previousInputPicker.
- 194-211: The
TagsCellcomponent has been refactored and now includes simplified logic and updated styling. This refactoring likely improves the maintainability and readability of the component. Verify that the new implementation correctly handles all expected input data formats and that the styling changes align with the overall design guidelines of the application.- 265-285: The
EditAndDeleteCellcomponent combines edit and delete functionalities into a single cell. This change likely streamlines the user interface and improves usability. Ensure that the component correctly handles both edit and delete actions, including any necessary confirmation dialogs for deletion and proper state management for editing.frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/index.tsx (1)
- 22-191: The
FleetSegmentsBackofficecomponent has been updated to include new functionalities and UI enhancements. Ensure that all new hooks and state variables are used correctly throughout the component. Pay particular attention to the management of fleet segments data and the handling of year entries, as these are critical for the correct functionality of the component. Additionally, verify that the UI changes, such as the new modal for creating or editing fleet segments, integrate well with the existing design and user flow.frontend/src/ui/LegacyRsuiteComponentsWrapper.tsx (1)
- 428-433: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-352]
The removal of styling rules related to
.rs-checkboxinLegacyRsuiteComponentsWrappercomponent has been noted. While this change seems to be part of a cleanup or refactoring effort, it's important to verify the UI's appearance and functionality to ensure that this removal does not adversely affect the user experience.frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (1)
- 6-119: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [10-217]
The updates to the Cypress tests in
new_regulation.spec.tsreflect changes in the UI and functionality of the new regulation feature. While these changes seem appropriate, it's important to verify the accuracy and reliability of the updated tests by running them against the application. Ensure that they cover the intended scenarios and behave as expected.frontend/src/features/ControlObjective/components/ControlObjectiveTable/SeaFrontControlObjectives.tsx (3)
- 18-18: The update to import paths in
SeaFrontControlObjectives.tsxreflects a reorganization of the module structure. Ensure that the updated paths correctly resolve to the intended modules.- 291-302: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [251-299]
Adjustments to the width of certain
Table.Columncomponents have been made. Verify the UI's appearance, especially the table column widths, to ensure that they provide the intended user experience.
- 351-352: Minor styling adjustments in the
Wrappercomponent contribute to a more consistent and maintainable codebase. These changes seem appropriate.frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/update_regulation.spec.ts (1)
- 2-2: The introduction of
customDayjsfor date handling is a positive change, likely offering improved handling of time zones or formats in tests.frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx (1)
- 3-6: Reorganizing imports for better readability and maintainability is a good practice. It helps in keeping the code clean and easy to navigate.
frontend/src/features/Regulation/slice.ts (1)
- 72-72: The change to simplify the type of
regulatoryTopicstostring[]enhances type safety and code clarity. Ensure that all usages ofregulatoryTopicsthroughout the codebase have been updated to reflect this new type.Verification successful
The analysis of the provided context confirms that the usage of
regulatoryTopicsthroughout the codebase aligns with its new type definition asstring[]. All instances whereregulatoryTopicsis used or manipulated are consistent with expecting an array of strings, indicating that the change has been correctly implemented across the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of regulatoryTopics to ensure they are correctly handled as string arrays. rg --type ts "regulatoryTopics" --context 5Length of output: 14501
frontend/src/features/VesselList/index.tsx (1)
- 34-34: The update to the import path for
useGetFleetSegmentsQueryreflects a change in the project's structure. Ensure the new path is correct and that the hook is still functioning as expected within the component.Verification successful
The verification confirms the existence of the
apis.tsfile at the updated import pathfrontend/src/features/FleetSegment, supporting the correctness of the change. Ensure theuseGetFleetSegmentsQueryhook functions as expected within the component.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the new import path for useGetFleetSegmentsQuery exists. fd "apis.ts" "frontend/src/features/FleetSegment"Length of output: 90
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/gear_regulation/RegulatedGears.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| const onCloseIconClicked = async () => { | ||
| await dispatch(updateProcessingRegulationByKey({ key: REGULATORY_REFERENCE_KEYS.ID, value: undefined })) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using async/await for the onCloseIconClicked function enhances readability and error handling. Ensure that error handling is implemented for the asynchronous dispatch call.
Consider wrapping the dispatch call in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully.
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| type CreateOrEditFleetSegmentModalProps = { | ||
| faoAreasList: any | ||
| onCancel: () => void | ||
| onCreate: (nextFleetSegment: UpdateFleetSegment) => void | ||
| onUpdate: (segment: string, year: number, nextFleetSegment: UpdateFleetSegment) => Promise<void> | ||
| updatedFleetSegment: FleetSegment | undefined | ||
| year: number | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The faoAreasList prop type is defined as any. For better type safety and code maintainability, it's recommended to replace any with a more specific type.
...c/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/CreateOrEditFleetSegmentModal.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (saveForm) { | ||
| const nameOrUrlIsMissing = checkNameAndUrl(reference, url) | ||
| const hasOneOrMoreValuesMissing = checkOtherRequiredValues(startDate, endDate, textType) || nameOrUrlIsMissing | ||
| const payload = { | ||
| complete: !hasOneOrMoreValuesMissing, | ||
| id | ||
| } | ||
| dispatch(addObjectToRegulatoryTextCheckedMap(payload)) | ||
| } | ||
| // TODO Refactor to avoid using a useEffect for an action | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | ||
| }, [saveForm, id, dispatch]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The useEffect hook is used to dispatch an action when saveForm changes. Consider extracting side effects that are not directly related to rendering into custom hooks for better separation of concerns.
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryText.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| import { createFleetSegmentFromAPI } from '@features/FleetSegment/apis' | ||
|
|
||
| import type { FleetSegment, UpdateFleetSegment } from '../../types/fleetSegment' | ||
| import { setError } from '../../../domain/shared_slices/Global' | ||
|
|
||
| import type { FleetSegment, UpdateFleetSegment } from '../types' | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Create a fleet segment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [36-36]
The addFleetSegments function correctly adds and sorts the fleet segments. However, consider using a more descriptive variable name than a and b in the sort comparator for better readability.
- return previousFleetSegments.concat(updatedFleetSegment).sort((a, b) => a.segment.localeCompare(b.segment))
+ return previousFleetSegments.concat(updatedFleetSegment).sort((segmentA, segmentB) => segmentA.segment.localeCompare(segmentB.segment))
louptheron
force-pushed
the
loup/fix-backoffice-form-components
branch
from
7081d32
to
4dabede
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (48)
- backend/src/main/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepository.kt (2 hunks)
- backend/src/test/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepositoryITests.kt (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/fleet_segments.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (6 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/update_regulation.spec.ts (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/api/APIWorker.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/domain/use_cases/vessel/getFleetSegments.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/ConfirmRegulationModal.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx (6 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/DayTimeCheckbox.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/FishingPeriodForm.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/gear_regulation/RegulatedGears.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/CreateRegulationTopicForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/index.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryText.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryTextSection.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/tableCells.jsx (7 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/ControlObjective/components/ControlObjectiveTable/SeaFrontControlObjectives.tsx (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/apis.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/CreateOrEditFleetSegmentModal.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/FleetSegmentsTable.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/schema.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/types.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/addFleetSegmentYear.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/createFleetSegment.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/deleteFleetSegment.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/getFleetSegmentsYearEntries.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/updateFleetSegment.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/FleetSegments.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/FleetSegmentsField.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/VesselFleetSegmentsField.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/hooks/useGetMissionActionFormikUsecases.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Regulation/slice.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/SideWindow/MissionList/FilterBar.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/VesselList/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Backoffice.style.tsx (9 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Buttons.style.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/router.tsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/ui/LegacyRsuiteComponentsWrapper.tsx (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (45)
- backend/src/main/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepository.kt
- backend/src/test/kotlin/fr/gouv/cnsp/monitorfish/infrastructure/database/repositories/JpaFleetSegmentRepositoryITests.kt
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/update_regulation.spec.ts
- frontend/src/api/APIWorker.tsx
- frontend/src/domain/use_cases/vessel/getFleetSegments.ts
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/ConfirmRegulationModal.jsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/DayTimeCheckbox.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/FishingPeriodForm.jsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/gear_regulation/RegulatedGears.jsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/CreateRegulationTopicForm.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/index.jsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryText.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/RegulatoryTextSection.jsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/utils.ts
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/tableCells.jsx
- frontend/src/features/ControlObjective/components/ControlObjectiveTable/SeaFrontControlObjectives.tsx
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/apis.ts
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/CreateOrEditFleetSegmentModal.tsx
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/FleetSegmentsTable.tsx
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/index.tsx
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/components/FleetSegmentsBackoffice/schema.ts
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/types.ts
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/addFleetSegmentYear.ts
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/createFleetSegment.ts
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/deleteFleetSegment.ts
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/getFleetSegmentsYearEntries.ts
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/updateFleetSegment.ts
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/FleetSegments.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/utils.ts
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/VesselFleetSegmentsField.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/utils.ts
- frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/hooks/useGetMissionActionFormikUsecases.ts
- frontend/src/features/Regulation/slice.ts
- frontend/src/features/SideWindow/MissionList/FilterBar.tsx
- frontend/src/features/VesselList/index.tsx
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Backoffice.style.tsx
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Buttons.style.jsx
- frontend/src/router.tsx
- frontend/src/ui/LegacyRsuiteComponentsWrapper.tsx
Additional comments: 11
frontend/src/features/Mission/components/MissionForm/ActionForm/shared/FleetSegmentsField.tsx (1)
- 1-1: The import path for
useGetFleetSegmentsQueryhas been updated to align with the new module structure. This change is crucial for maintaining consistency across the project and ensuring that the component has access to the latest API functionalities.frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/fleet_segments.spec.ts (2)
- 17-91: The test scenario "Should list and update fleet segments" has been updated to reflect the changes in the UI and functionality. The assertions and interactions with the UI elements, such as clicking and filling forms, are correctly updated to match the new flow. It's important to ensure that these changes are aligned with the intended behavior of the application.
- 93-144: The test scenario "Should create a new fleet segment and delete it" accurately reflects the addition of creating and deleting fleet segments. The steps for creating a new segment, including filling out the form and verifying the creation, followed by deletion and verification, are correctly implemented. This test ensures the functionality works as expected.
frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (8)
- 10-24: The test scenario for selecting, changing, and removing law types has been updated to reflect the UI changes. The steps for interacting with the dropdown, selecting different law types, and verifying the UI response are correctly implemented. This ensures the dropdown functionality works as expected.
- 29-45: The test for updating the layer name list based on the selected law type accurately reflects the changes in the UI. The steps for selecting different law types and verifying the corresponding changes in the layer name list are correctly implemented, ensuring the dynamic behavior of the UI is tested.
- 48-59: The test for enabling or disabling the region list based on the selected law type is correctly updated. The interactions with the UI elements and the assertions to verify the enabled/disabled state of the region list are accurately implemented, testing the conditional behavior of the UI.
- 64-76: The test for selecting and removing regions accurately reflects the changes in the UI. The steps for selecting multiple regions, verifying the tags, and removing a selected region are correctly implemented, ensuring the multi-select and tag removal functionalities work as expected.
- 80-91: The test for entering a regulation text name with a valid URL and verifying the modal interactions for saving and canceling changes is well-implemented. The form input handling, button interactions, and modal behavior are correctly tested, ensuring the form functionality and modal interactions work as intended.
- 95-115: The modal behavior on the go-back button click is accurately tested. The steps for filling out the form, triggering the modal, and verifying the modal's behavior on different actions are correctly implemented, ensuring the modal functionality works as expected in the context of unsaved changes.
- 148-154: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [151-166]
The tests for checking all towed and passive gears and displaying the corresponding gear categories are correctly updated. The interactions with the UI elements and the assertions to verify the list of gear categories are accurately implemented, testing the checkbox and list behavior.
- 176-190: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [179-217]
The test for modification of inputs being kept in local storage when refreshing the page is well-implemented. The steps for filling out the form, saving the changes, refreshing the page, and verifying that the inputs are retained accurately test the local storage functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (15)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/ConfirmRegulationModal.jsx (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/DayTimeCheckbox.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/list_regulation/SearchRegulations.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/utils.ts (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Regulation/types.ts (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Regulation/utils.ts (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Backoffice.style.tsx (7 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/FishingPeriod.style.tsx (1 hunks)
Check Runs (1)
Run frontend unit tests completed (16)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts: 5-5: There should be at least one empty line between import groups
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts: 6-6: There should be at least one empty line between import groups
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts: 6-6: '/home/runner/work/monitorfish/monitorfish/frontend/src/features/Regulation/types.ts' imported multiple times
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts: 7-7:
../Regulation/utilsimport should occur before type import of../Regulation/types - frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts: 9-9: '/home/runner/work/monitorfish/monitorfish/frontend/src/features/Regulation/types.ts' imported multiple times
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/ConfirmRegulationModal.jsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/fishing_period/DayTimeCheckbox.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/regulatory_text/utils.ts
- frontend/src/features/Logbook/components/VesselLogbook/LogbookSummary/utils.ts
- frontend/src/features/commonStyles/Backoffice.style.tsx
| import { STATUS } from './constants' | ||
| import type { EditedRegulatoryZone } from '../Regulation/types' | ||
| import { DEFAULT_REGULATION, REGULATORY_REFERENCE_KEYS } from '../Regulation/utils' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider reordering imports to group external and internal imports separately for better readability.
import { createSlice } from '@reduxjs/toolkit'
+ import type { EditedRegulatoryZone } from '../Regulation/types'
import { STATUS } from './constants'
- import type { EditedRegulatoryZone } from '../Regulation/types'
import { DEFAULT_REGULATION, REGULATORY_REFERENCE_KEYS } from '../Regulation/utils'Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| import { STATUS } from './constants' | |
| import type { EditedRegulatoryZone } from '../Regulation/types' | |
| import { DEFAULT_REGULATION, REGULATORY_REFERENCE_KEYS } from '../Regulation/utils' | |
| import { createSlice } from '@reduxjs/toolkit' | |
| import { STATUS } from './constants' | |
| import type { EditedRegulatoryZone } from '../Regulation/types' | |
| import { DEFAULT_REGULATION, REGULATORY_REFERENCE_KEYS } from '../Regulation/utils' |
| import styled from 'styled-components' | ||
|
|
||
| export function CreateRegulationTopicForm({ onCancelEdit, updateTopic }) { | ||
| const [topicPlace, setTopicPlace] = useState<string | undefined>('') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
il ne faudrait pas plutôt mettre undefined en valeur initiale? et idem dans la fonction resetThemeForm() . J'ai peur que sinon tu ais un affichage bizarre dans regulationTopic ligne 23
Et si tu laisse un string vide pas besoin du type undefined je pense
(Valable pour tous les states)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tout ce code est du code legacy du ficheir js, j'ai essayé de ne pas trop toucher le code métier et de surtout remplacer les composants rsuite, mais en effet je peux regarder pour améliorer cette gestion
| <Button accent={Accent.SECONDARY} onClick={addNewTopic}> | ||
| Enregistrer | ||
| </Button> | ||
| <Button accent={Accent.TERTIARY} onClick={onCancelEdit}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
comme tu mets addNewTopic j'aurais mis cancelEdit mais pas obligé
There was a problem hiding this comment.
J'ai mis un onXXX car c'est une prop et je crois qu'on a comme convention d'appeler les props comme ça ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
dans ce cas il fait mettre onAddNewTopic . Ma remarque était surtout d'avoir une cohérence entre les deux fonctions appelées par le onClick (lignes 69 et 72)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (6 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/update_regulation.spec.ts (6 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx (8 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/update_regulation.spec.ts
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/slice.ts
Additional comments: 9
frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (9)
- 10-11: The test for the law type list containing 18 elements has been removed. This change aligns with the PR objectives to refactor the selection, change, and removal of law types. However, it's important to ensure that the removal of this assertion does not reduce the coverage or effectiveness of the tests.
Ensure that the updated tests adequately cover the scenarios previously validated by the removed assertion.
- 15-24: Refactoring the selection, change, and removal of law types is demonstrated through interactions with UI components. The use of custom commands like
cy.fillfor filling inputs simplifies the test code and improves readability. However, ensure that these custom commands handle edge cases and errors gracefully.Consider adding error handling and logging within custom Cypress commands to improve debuggability.
- 29-45: The logic for changing law types and updating layer names, including handling an empty list for UE law types, is well tested. This ensures that the UI behaves as expected when different law types are selected. It's crucial to maintain these tests up-to-date as the application evolves.
Good coverage of law type selection and its impact on other UI elements.
- 48-59: The test for enabling/disabling the region list based on law type selection is crucial for ensuring the correct UI behavior. This test effectively validates the dynamic nature of the form based on user input.
Well-implemented test for dynamic form behavior based on law type selection.
- 64-76: Enhancing the interaction with tags for regions and law types is demonstrated through the addition and removal of tags in the UI. This test case effectively validates the UI's responsiveness to user actions.
Effective testing of tag addition and removal in the UI.
- 80-91: Improved form input handling and button interactions are tested here, including the behavior of saving and clearing form inputs. This ensures that the form behaves as expected when users enter data and interact with buttons.
Comprehensive testing of form input handling and button interactions.
- 95-115: Streamlined modal interactions for saving and canceling changes are well tested. This includes handling the modal's visibility and the actions within it, ensuring that the modal behaves as expected in various scenarios.
Thorough testing of modal interactions related to saving and canceling changes.
- 151-151: The tests for checking all towed and passive gears display a list of gear categories effectively validate the UI's behavior in response to user selections. These tests are crucial for ensuring that the application correctly displays relevant information based on user input.
Effective validation of UI behavior for towed and passive gear selections.
Also applies to: 166-166
- 176-190: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [179-217]
Enhanced behavior for keeping modifications in local storage is tested here. This test ensures that user inputs and selections are retained across page refreshes, which is crucial for a good user experience.
Comprehensive testing of local storage behavior to ensure user inputs are retained across page refreshes.
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
frontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.jsonfrontend/package.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (17)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (6 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/air_control.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/air_surveillance.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/land_control.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/main_form.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/observation.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/sea_control.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_list/filter_bar.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/cypress/support/e2e.ts (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx (9 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/CreateRegulationTopicForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/updateFleetSegment.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/EditRegulation.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/CreateRegulationTopicForm.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationGeometryLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLawTypeLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationLayerZoneLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationRegionLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/Backoffice/edit_regulation/identification/RegulationTopicLine.tsx
- frontend/src/features/FleetSegment/useCases/updateFleetSegment.ts
Additional comments: 18
frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_list/filter_bar.spec.ts (1)
- 46-47: Splitting
cy.fillandcy.waitinto separate commands improves readability and explicitness of test steps. Ensure thecy.wait(500)is necessary and not introducing potential flakiness.frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/observation.spec.ts (1)
- 107-108: Splitting
cy.fillandcy.waitinto separate commands improves readability. Ensure thecy.wait(500)is necessary and not introducing potential flakiness.frontend/cypress/support/e2e.ts (1)
- 4-4: Adding a reference path to TypeScript declarations enhances type safety and autocompletion for Cypress tests. Ensure that the removed methods are not used elsewhere in the test suite.
frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/air_control.spec.ts (1)
- 135-140: Removing or adjusting wait times can improve test speed and reduce potential flakiness. Ensure the tests remain stable and reliable without these specific waits.
frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/air_surveillance.spec.ts (1)
- 155-156: Separating
cy.fillandcy.waitinto separate commands can improve readability. Ensure thecy.wait(500)is necessary and not introducing potential flakiness.frontend/cypress/e2e/backoffice/new_regulation.spec.ts (9)
- 10-24: Refactoring form interactions improves test clarity and logic. Ensure that changes do not introduce flakiness or instability in the tests.
- 29-45: Updating logic for changing law types and updating layer names enhances test accuracy. Verify that the updated interactions correctly reflect the application's behavior.
- 48-59: Adjusting region list enabling/disabling based on law type selection improves test relevance. Ensure that these interactions are stable and accurately test the application's functionality.
- 64-76: Enhancing interaction with tags for regions and law types improves test clarity. Verify that tag manipulation behaves as expected in the application.
- 80-93: Streamlining modal interactions for saving and canceling changes enhances test flow. Ensure that modal behavior is correctly tested and reflects the application's functionality.
- 97-117: Improving behavior for keeping modifications in local storage ensures test accuracy. Verify that local storage behavior is correctly simulated and tested.
- 153-153: Streamlining gear selection interactions enhances test clarity. Ensure that gear selection behavior is accurately tested.
- 168-168: Improving passive gear selection interactions enhances test clarity. Ensure that passive gear selection behavior is accurately tested.
- 178-194: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [181-221]
Enhancing local storage behavior testing ensures modifications are retained accurately. Verify that the test correctly simulates and validates local storage behavior.
frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/main_form.spec.ts (3)
- 197-204: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [200-215]
The use of
cy.wait(250)andcy.wait(500)to manage timing issues in Cypress tests is generally discouraged as it introduces potential flakiness and increases test execution time. Instead, consider using more reliable synchronization methods such ascy.intercept()to wait for specific network requests to complete orcy.get()with timeouts for UI elements to appear.Consider replacing direct waits with more deterministic wait mechanisms, such as waiting for specific API calls to complete or UI elements to become visible.
- 197-204: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
It's good practice to include a brief comment at the top of the test file explaining the purpose of the tests and any specific setup or assumptions made. This aids in maintainability and understanding for new contributors or when revisiting the tests after some time.
Consider adding a file-level comment describing the scope and purpose of these Cypress tests.
- 197-204: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The tests cover a wide range of functionalities related to mission form interactions. For larger test suites, consider organizing tests into separate files based on the functionality they're testing (e.g., mission creation, mission editing, mission deletion) to improve readability and maintainability.
Evaluate the test suite's organization and consider splitting it into multiple files if it becomes too large or covers distinctly different functionalities.
frontend/cypress/e2e/side_window/mission_form/sea_control.spec.ts (1)
- 392-393: The separation of
cy.fillandcy.waitcommands into distinct lines improves readability and makes the test flow easier to understand. However, it's important to ensure that the removal of the wait duration from thecy.fillcommand does not adversely affect the stability of the tests. Consider verifying if the tests remain stable and reliable without these explicit waits, as excessive waiting can slow down test execution without adding value.
| cy.fill('Saisi par', 'Gaumont') | ||
| cy.wait(500) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The separation of the cy.fill and cy.wait commands for the "Saisi par" field is a good practice to ensure that the wait time occurs after filling the input, which can help avoid flakiness in tests due to timing issues. However, using a fixed cy.wait(500) might not be the most reliable way to handle waiting for actions to complete in Cypress tests. Consider using cy.wait('@alias') for waiting on specific network requests to complete or cy.get() with a timeout for waiting on specific elements to be visible or actionable, which can make the tests more robust and less prone to timing issues.
- cy.wait(500)
+ // Consider replacing fixed waits with more deterministic wait conditions
+ // Example: cy.wait('@aliasForSomeNetworkRequest')
+ // or cy.get('selectorForNextActionableElement', { timeout: 10000 }).should('be.visible')Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| cy.fill('Saisi par', 'Gaumont') | |
| cy.wait(500) | |
| cy.fill('Saisi par', 'Gaumont') | |
| // Consider replacing fixed waits with more deterministic wait conditions | |
| // Example: cy.wait('@aliasForSomeNetworkRequest') | |
| // or cy.get('selectorForNextActionableElement', { timeout: 10000 }).should('be.visible') |
| cy.fill('Administration 1', 'DDTM') | ||
| cy.fill('Unité 1', 'Cultures marines 56') | ||
| cy.wait(500) | ||
| cy.fill('Moyen 1', ['Brezel - FAH 7185']).wait(250) | ||
| cy.fill('Moyen 1', ['Brezel - FAH 7185']) | ||
| cy.wait(250) | ||
| cy.fill('Contact de l’unité 1', 'Bob') | ||
| cy.fill('Contact de l’unité 1', 'Bob') | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
Ensure that all cy.intercept() calls are as specific as possible to avoid unintentionally catching unrelated requests. This is particularly important in tests where multiple network requests are made, and you need to assert or wait on specific ones.
Review and refine cy.intercept() usage to target specific requests more accurately, reducing the risk of flaky tests.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
Consider adding tests or assertions that specifically handle error scenarios, such as network failures, API errors, or invalid user inputs. This ensures that the application behaves gracefully under such conditions and improves test coverage.
Add tests or assertions for error handling scenarios to ensure comprehensive coverage and robustness of the application.
Linked issues
Summary by CodeRabbit
SquareButtoncomponent for better UI alignment.