Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 208.0.0 #4731

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

Release 208.0.0 #4731

merged 13 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

ccharly
Copy link
Contributor

@ccharly ccharly commented Sep 25, 2024

Explanation

This is a RC for v208.0.0. See changelog for more details

References

N/A

Changelog

N/A

Checklist

  • I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or updated code as appropriate
  • I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category above as appropriate
  • I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer packages to resolve any breaking changes

@ccharly ccharly marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2024 15:28
@ccharly ccharly requested review from a team as code owners September 25, 2024 15:28
hmalik88
hmalik88 previously approved these changes Sep 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@MajorLift MajorLift left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The following appear to be dev dependency updates, which we generally don't note in changelogs.

Edit: Although if they provide useful context for the team, keeping them shouldn't be an issue.

Comment on lines +15 to +17
- Bump accounts related packages ([#4713](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/4713)), ([#4728](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/4728))
- Those packages are now built slightly differently and are part of the [accounts monorepo](https://github.com/MetaMask/accounts).
- Bump `@metamask/keyring-api` from `^8.1.0` to `^8.1.4`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Bump accounts related packages ([#4713](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/4713)), ([#4728](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/pull/4728))
- Those packages are now built slightly differently and are part of the [accounts monorepo](https://github.com/MetaMask/accounts).
- Bump `@metamask/keyring-api` from `^8.1.0` to `^8.1.4`

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes true, but I wanted to mark those since the introduction of our new monorepo on the account side. We have done some basic testing on the extension side (using our e2e and some manual testing with preview builds) but in case there's any regression (there should not) I thought it would be great to have this being commented somewhere in the CHANGELOG.

If you think that's "too much", I'm also ok removing those!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds perfectly reasonable to keep them. Just wanted to be sure their inclusion was intentional.

packages/profile-sync-controller/CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/transaction-controller/CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@MajorLift MajorLift left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ccharly ccharly merged commit 9949c81 into main Sep 25, 2024
116 checks passed
@ccharly ccharly deleted the release/208.0.0 branch September 25, 2024 19:23
ccharly added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
@ccharly ccharly mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
4 tasks
ccharly added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
## Explanation

This reverts commit 9949c81.

The `assets-controllers` version was wrong for the last RC. So we have
to revert this RC and re-create it while fixing the `assets-controllers`
bad version.

Version during that release [was
`38.0.2`](https://github.com/MetaMask/core/blob/eb656db1704c6dcfa9474086434b267b15e62c97/packages/assets-controllers/package.json#L3)
but it should have been `38.1.0`.

## References

- #4731

## Changelog

N/A

## Checklist

- [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or
updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category
above as appropriate
- [ ] I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer
packages to resolve any breaking changes
ccharly added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
## Explanation

This is a RC for v208.0.0. See changelog for more details

## References

N/A

## Changelog

N/A

## Checklist

- [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or
updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category
above as appropriate
- [ ] I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer
packages to resolve any breaking changes
@ccharly ccharly mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
4 tasks
ccharly added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
## Explanation

This is a RC for v208.0.0. See changelog for more details

## References

Initial attempt:
- #4731

Revert of the failing 208.0.0:
- #4733

## Changelog

N/A

## Checklist

- [ ] I've updated the test suite for new or updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've updated documentation (JSDoc, Markdown, etc.) for new or
updated code as appropriate
- [ ] I've highlighted breaking changes using the "BREAKING" category
above as appropriate
- [ ] I've prepared draft pull requests for clients and consumer
packages to resolve any breaking changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants