Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve compliance with RFC 9589 #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024
Merged

Improve compliance with RFC 9589 #144

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

job
Copy link
Contributor

@job job commented Aug 22, 2024

As of 9589, the CMS SigningTime attribute is mandatory and the CMS BinarySigningTime attribute is forbidden.

Question for @ydahhrk does oid2arcs().MAX_ARCS need to be reduced by 1, because 1 OID declaration is removed?

As of 9589, the CMS SigningTime attribute is mandatory and the
CMS BinarySigningTime attribute is forbidden.
@ydahhrk
Copy link
Member

ydahhrk commented Aug 22, 2024

Question for @ydahhrk does oid2arcs().MAX_ARCS need to be reduced by 1, because 1 OID declaration is removed?

No, it's fine. MAX_ARCS counts OID arcs, not OIDs.

(Also, it's just a suggestion. oid2arcs() adjusts and retries if it doesn't work.)

Thanks!

@ydahhrk ydahhrk modified the milestones: 1.6.4, 1.7.0 Aug 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants