Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing CNMEM switches #82

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2015
Merged

Removing CNMEM switches #82

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2015

Conversation

borisfom
Copy link

Removed CNMEM references

Removed CNMEM references
@lukeyeager
Copy link
Member

I have tests failing because of another issue - #78 (comment) - but this change looks solid.

Built with (1) CPU only, (2) CUDA and (3) CUDA+cuDNN - all builds passed all tests when using a single GPU.

lukeyeager added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2015
@lukeyeager lukeyeager merged commit 3bfc708 into NVIDIA:caffe-0.14 Nov 20, 2015
@borisfom
Copy link
Author

Superb. Hopefully it will fix the corruption issues folks were seeing lately.

From: Luke Yeager <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: NVIDIA/caffe <reply@reply.github.commailto:reply@reply.github.com>
Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 at 2:38 PM
To: NVIDIA/caffe <caffe@noreply.github.commailto:caffe@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Boris Fomitchev <bfomitchev@nvidia.commailto:bfomitchev@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [caffe] Removing CNMEM switches (#82)

Merged #82#82.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/82#event-470944749.


This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by

reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants