Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #338: Work on implementation of cudaq::adjoint. #374

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2023

Conversation

schweitzpgi
Copy link
Collaborator

@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi commented Jul 7, 2023

Fix #338
These patches bring cudaq::control and cudaq::adjoint to parity. Add test.

These patches bring cudaq::control and cudaq::adjoint to parity. Add
test.
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi enabled auto-merge (squash) July 7, 2023 16:57
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi merged commit 0230fee into NVIDIA:main Jul 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 7, 2023
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi deleted the ch-i338 branch July 7, 2023 18:40
@bettinaheim bettinaheim added the bug fix To be listed under Bug Fixes in the release notes label Jul 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug fix To be listed under Bug Fixes in the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Handle func::ConstantOp for adjoint / control in the ASTBridge
2 participants