Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support ranged for-loops when targeting quantum hardware backends #833

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023
Merged

Support ranged for-loops when targeting quantum hardware backends #833

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

schweitzpgi
Copy link
Collaborator

@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi commented Oct 27, 2023 •
edited by bettinaheim
Loading

This PR is one of several PRs that cover the features outlined in #646

@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 27, 2023
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi linked an issue Oct 27, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Support ranged for loops, std::reverse iterator modifier, and cudaq::range #646
Closed
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2023
@cuda-quantum-bot
Docs preview for PR #833.
2c378ab
@schweitzpgi
Add ranged for statement support over cudaq::qreg.
832eae0 
Adds preliminary support for a ranged for statement over a cudaq::qreg
in the bridge. Add a simple test.
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
@cuda-quantum-bot
Docs preview for PR #833.
826fbcc
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi added this to the release 0.5.0 milestone Oct 31, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
@cuda-quantum-bot
Docs preview for PR #833.
9bd0ab5
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi enabled auto-merge (squash) October 31, 2023 21:50
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
@cuda-quantum-bot
Docs preview for PR #833.
3d79d99
1tnguyen
1tnguyen approved these changes Nov 1, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@1tnguyen 1tnguyen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2023

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
@cuda-quantum-bot
Docs preview for PR #833.
862e458
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi merged commit 2788a44 into NVIDIA:main Nov 1, 2023
105 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 1, 2023
@schweitzpgi schweitzpgi deleted the ch-range.for.qreg branch November 1, 2023 16:38
@bettinaheim bettinaheim changed the title Add ranged for statement support over cudaq::qreg. Support ranged for-loops when targeting quantum hardware backends Nov 15, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@1tnguyen 1tnguyen 1tnguyen approved these changes

@amccaskey amccaskey Awaiting requested review from amccaskey

@anthony-santana anthony-santana Awaiting requested review from anthony-santana

@bmhowe23 bmhowe23 Awaiting requested review from bmhowe23

@khalatepradnya khalatepradnya Awaiting requested review from khalatepradnya

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
release 0.5.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support ranged for loops, std::reverse iterator modifier, and cudaq::range
2 participants
@schweitzpgi @1tnguyen