Disable test_broadcast_nested_loop_join_condition_missing_count on Databricks #3246
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tabricks Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe <jlowe@nvidia.com>
|
build |
tgravescs
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2021
razajafri
pushed a commit
to razajafri/spark-rapids
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2021
…tabricks (NVIDIA#3246) Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe <jlowe@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Raza Jafri <rjafri@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Relates to #3244
The new test_broadcast_nested_loop_join_condition_missing_count test is failing due to what appears to be a bug in hash aggregate code. It looks like we're trying to pull out an input reference from a batch that has no columns. Thus this looks more like a latent bug in hash aggregate on Databricks that was exposed in by the new join code rather than a bug in the new join code itself.
To unblock the build while more investigation into the hash aggregate issue occurs, this xfails the test on Databricks and references #3244.