Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert commonizing the int96ParquetRebase* functions #4306

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2021

Conversation

tgravescs
Copy link
Collaborator

@tgravescs tgravescs commented Dec 6, 2021

These functions are different between Spark 3.0.x and 3.1.x but they were commonized.

fixes #4294

I checked the other functions that were commonized and didn't see any other issues.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves tgraves@nvidia.com

different between Spark 3.0.x and 3.1.x

Signed-off-by: Thomas Graves <tgraves@nvidia.com>
@tgravescs tgravescs added bug Something isn't working P0 Must have for release labels Dec 6, 2021
@tgravescs tgravescs added this to the Nov 30 - Dec 10 milestone Dec 6, 2021
@tgravescs tgravescs self-assigned this Dec 6, 2021
@tgravescs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

@tgravescs tgravescs merged commit b7e5467 into NVIDIA:branch-22.02 Dec 6, 2021
@tgravescs tgravescs deleted the fix311rebasedattime branch December 6, 2021 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working P0 Must have for release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] parquet_write_test.py::test_ts_write_fails_datetime_exception failed in spark 3.1.1 and 3.1.2
3 participants