Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor for shims 320+ #4465

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

res-life
Copy link
Collaborator

@res-life res-life commented Jan 6, 2022

Add a new Spark320PlusShims; then Spark322PlusShims and Spark320until322Shims extends the Spark320PlusShims

This contributes #4447

Signed-off-by: Chong Gao res_life@163.com

Signed-off-by: Chong Gao <res_life@163.com>
@res-life res-life requested a review from firestarman January 6, 2022 03:36
@res-life
Copy link
Collaborator Author

res-life commented Jan 6, 2022

This fixes the comments from @tgravescs in #4447
Add a new Spark320PlusShims; then Spark322PlusShims and Spark320until322Shims extends the Spark320PlusShims

Signed-off-by: Chong Gao <res_life@163.com>
@res-life
Copy link
Collaborator Author

res-life commented Jan 6, 2022

build

@firestarman
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

@firestarman firestarman requested a review from tgravescs January 6, 2022 05:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@tgravescs tgravescs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, can you please move the description of what is changing up to the first comment in the PR. That makes it easier for reviewer.

@tgravescs tgravescs merged commit 3bd8c7e into NVIDIA:branch-22.02 Jan 6, 2022
@sameerz sameerz added the build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building label Jan 6, 2022
@res-life res-life deleted the fix-comments branch March 13, 2022 05:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Related to CI / CD or cleanly building
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants