Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge branch 'fixes-for-bits-iterator'
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Hou Tao says:

====================
The patch set fixes several issues in bits iterator. Patch ChimeraOS#1 fixes the
kmemleak problem of bits iterator. Patch ChimeraOS#2~ChimeraOS#3 fix the overflow problem
of nr_bits. Patch ChimeraOS#4 fixes the potential stack corruption when bits
iterator is used on 32-bit host. Patch ChimeraOS#5 adds more test cases for bits
iterator.

Please see the individual patches for more details. And comments are
always welcome.
---
v4:
 * patch ChimeraOS#1: add ack from Yafang
 * patch ChimeraOS#3: revert code-churn like changes:
   (1) compute nr_bytes and nr_bits before the check of nr_words.
   (2) use nr_bits == 64 to check for single u64, preventing build
       warning on 32-bit hosts.
 * patch ChimeraOS#4: use "BITS_PER_LONG == 32" instead of "!defined(CONFIG_64BIT)"

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241025013233.804027-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/T/#t
  * split the bits-iterator related patches from "Misc fixes for bpf"
    patch set
  * patch ChimeraOS#1: use "!nr_bits || bits >= nr_bits" to stop the iteration
  * patch ChimeraOS#2: add a new helper for the overflow problem
  * patch ChimeraOS#3: decrease the limitation from 512 to 511 and check whether
    nr_bytes is too large for bpf memory allocator explicitly
  * patch ChimeraOS#5: add two more test cases for bit iterator

v2: http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d49fa2f4-f743-c763-7579-c3cab4dd88cb@huaweicloud.com
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241030100516.3633640-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
Alexei Starovoitov committed Oct 30, 2024
2 parents d0b98f6 + ebafc1e commit 053b212
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 118 additions and 14 deletions.
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions include/linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ int bpf_mem_alloc_percpu_init(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, struct obj_cgroup *objcg
int bpf_mem_alloc_percpu_unit_init(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, int size);
void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma);

/* Check the allocation size for kmalloc equivalent allocator */
int bpf_mem_alloc_check_size(bool percpu, size_t size);

/* kmalloc/kfree equivalent: */
void *bpf_mem_alloc(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, size_t size);
void bpf_mem_free(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, void *ptr);
Expand Down
54 changes: 44 additions & 10 deletions kernel/bpf/helpers.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2851,21 +2851,47 @@ struct bpf_iter_bits {
__u64 __opaque[2];
} __aligned(8);

#define BITS_ITER_NR_WORDS_MAX 511

struct bpf_iter_bits_kern {
union {
unsigned long *bits;
unsigned long bits_copy;
__u64 *bits;
__u64 bits_copy;
};
u32 nr_bits;
int nr_bits;
int bit;
} __aligned(8);

/* On 64-bit hosts, unsigned long and u64 have the same size, so passing
* a u64 pointer and an unsigned long pointer to find_next_bit() will
* return the same result, as both point to the same 8-byte area.
*
* For 32-bit little-endian hosts, using a u64 pointer or unsigned long
* pointer also makes no difference. This is because the first iterated
* unsigned long is composed of bits 0-31 of the u64 and the second unsigned
* long is composed of bits 32-63 of the u64.
*
* However, for 32-bit big-endian hosts, this is not the case. The first
* iterated unsigned long will be bits 32-63 of the u64, so swap these two
* ulong values within the u64.
*/
static void swap_ulong_in_u64(u64 *bits, unsigned int nr)
{
#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32) && defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
unsigned int i;

for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
bits[i] = (bits[i] >> 32) | ((u64)(u32)bits[i] << 32);
#endif
}

/**
* bpf_iter_bits_new() - Initialize a new bits iterator for a given memory area
* @it: The new bpf_iter_bits to be created
* @unsafe_ptr__ign: A pointer pointing to a memory area to be iterated over
* @nr_words: The size of the specified memory area, measured in 8-byte units.
* Due to the limitation of memalloc, it can't be greater than 512.
* The maximum value of @nr_words is @BITS_ITER_NR_WORDS_MAX. This limit may be
* further reduced by the BPF memory allocator implementation.
*
* This function initializes a new bpf_iter_bits structure for iterating over
* a memory area which is specified by the @unsafe_ptr__ign and @nr_words. It
Expand All @@ -2892,17 +2918,24 @@ bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const u64 *unsafe_ptr__ign, u32 nr_w

if (!unsafe_ptr__ign || !nr_words)
return -EINVAL;
if (nr_words > BITS_ITER_NR_WORDS_MAX)
return -E2BIG;

/* Optimization for u64 mask */
if (nr_bits == 64) {
err = bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(&kit->bits_copy, nr_bytes, unsafe_ptr__ign);
if (err)
return -EFAULT;

swap_ulong_in_u64(&kit->bits_copy, nr_words);

kit->nr_bits = nr_bits;
return 0;
}

if (bpf_mem_alloc_check_size(false, nr_bytes))
return -E2BIG;

/* Fallback to memalloc */
kit->bits = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, nr_bytes);
if (!kit->bits)
Expand All @@ -2914,6 +2947,8 @@ bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const u64 *unsafe_ptr__ign, u32 nr_w
return err;
}

swap_ulong_in_u64(kit->bits, nr_words);

kit->nr_bits = nr_bits;
return 0;
}
Expand All @@ -2930,17 +2965,16 @@ bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const u64 *unsafe_ptr__ign, u32 nr_w
__bpf_kfunc int *bpf_iter_bits_next(struct bpf_iter_bits *it)
{
struct bpf_iter_bits_kern *kit = (void *)it;
u32 nr_bits = kit->nr_bits;
const unsigned long *bits;
int bit;
int bit = kit->bit, nr_bits = kit->nr_bits;
const void *bits;

if (nr_bits == 0)
if (!nr_bits || bit >= nr_bits)
return NULL;

bits = nr_bits == 64 ? &kit->bits_copy : kit->bits;
bit = find_next_bit(bits, nr_bits, kit->bit + 1);
bit = find_next_bit(bits, nr_bits, bit + 1);
if (bit >= nr_bits) {
kit->nr_bits = 0;
kit->bit = bit;
return NULL;
}

Expand Down
14 changes: 13 additions & 1 deletion kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
*/
#define LLIST_NODE_SZ sizeof(struct llist_node)

#define BPF_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE_MAX 4096

/* similar to kmalloc, but sizeof == 8 bucket is gone */
static u8 size_index[24] __ro_after_init = {
3, /* 8 */
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -65,7 +67,7 @@ static u8 size_index[24] __ro_after_init = {

static int bpf_mem_cache_idx(size_t size)
{
if (!size || size > 4096)
if (!size || size > BPF_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE_MAX)
return -1;

if (size <= 192)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1005,3 +1007,13 @@ void notrace *bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, gfp_t flags)

return !ret ? NULL : ret + LLIST_NODE_SZ;
}

int bpf_mem_alloc_check_size(bool percpu, size_t size)
{
/* The size of percpu allocation doesn't have LLIST_NODE_SZ overhead */
if ((percpu && size > BPF_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE_MAX) ||
(!percpu && size > BPF_MEM_ALLOC_SIZE_MAX - LLIST_NODE_SZ))
return -E2BIG;

return 0;
}
61 changes: 58 additions & 3 deletions tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bits_iter.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ int bpf_iter_bits_new(struct bpf_iter_bits *it, const u64 *unsafe_ptr__ign,
int *bpf_iter_bits_next(struct bpf_iter_bits *it) __ksym __weak;
void bpf_iter_bits_destroy(struct bpf_iter_bits *it) __ksym __weak;

u64 bits_array[511] = {};

SEC("iter.s/cgroup")
__description("bits iter without destroy")
__failure __msg("Unreleased reference")
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -110,16 +112,16 @@ int bit_index(void)
}

SEC("syscall")
__description("bits nomem")
__description("bits too big")
__success __retval(0)
int bits_nomem(void)
int bits_too_big(void)
{
u64 data[4];
int nr = 0;
int *bit;

__builtin_memset(&data, 0xff, sizeof(data));
bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], 513) /* Be greater than 512 */
bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], 512) /* Be greater than 511 */
nr++;
return nr;
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -151,3 +153,56 @@ int zero_words(void)
nr++;
return nr;
}

SEC("syscall")
__description("huge words")
__success __retval(0)
int huge_words(void)
{
u64 data[8] = {0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1};
int nr = 0;
int *bit;

bpf_for_each(bits, bit, &data[0], 67108865)
nr++;
return nr;
}

SEC("syscall")
__description("max words")
__success __retval(4)
int max_words(void)
{
volatile int nr = 0;
int *bit;

bits_array[0] = (1ULL << 63) | 1U;
bits_array[510] = (1ULL << 33) | (1ULL << 32);

bpf_for_each(bits, bit, bits_array, 511) {
if (nr == 0 && *bit != 0)
break;
if (nr == 2 && *bit != 32672)
break;
nr++;
}
return nr;
}

SEC("syscall")
__description("bad words")
__success __retval(0)
int bad_words(void)
{
void *bad_addr = (void *)(3UL << 30);
int nr = 0;
int *bit;

bpf_for_each(bits, bit, bad_addr, 1)
nr++;

bpf_for_each(bits, bit, bad_addr, 4)
nr++;

return nr;
}

0 comments on commit 053b212

Please sign in to comment.