Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proper symbolic bound tightening for Signs #374

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 14, 2020

Conversation

guykatzz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@guykatzz guykatzz requested a review from guyam2 September 13, 2020 13:51
There are two ways we can determine that a Sign has become fixed:

1. If the Sign's variable has been externally fixed
2. lbLb >= 0 (Positive) or ubUb <= 0 (Negative)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guykatzz if up<=0 then there is no fix because the function is non-continuous

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure I understand. Fixed here means phase fixed - if ubOfUb is negative (should be <, not <=, in the comment), then the upper bound is negative, and the Sign is in the negative phase.

@guyam2 guyam2 merged commit ae66cc2 into NeuralNetworkVerification:master Sep 14, 2020
@guykatzz guykatzz deleted the sign_sbt branch June 8, 2021 12:51
matanost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2021
* support SBT for signs

* bug fix

* minor

Co-authored-by: Guy Katz <guykatz@cs.huji.ac.il>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants