Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ELFvx ABIs for PowerPC64 #182807
Add ELFvx ABIs for PowerPC64 #182807
Changes from all commits
cdac1b4
b147fda
45d5fbb
569edff
a8447c2
b2e0e09
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Were these two lines really essential?
They cause a problem: now if we parse
powerpc64-apple-linux-gnu
and then unparse it, we get backpowerpc64-apple-linux-gnuabielfv2
. That disagrees withgnu-config
:I still agree with nixpkgs PowerPC64-BE using elfv2, I just don't think the triple parsing routine is the right place to impose that default...
I've included a commit to revert these two lines as part of #235230; if that's a problem, or if there's a different way we should be handling this, please let me know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
428c5456060ebe25ac889d9f666dfd3d114cbff0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@OPNA2608, if you need a quick fix, the root cause is the deletion of these two lines in 82ff1f5.