snappy: 1.1.9 -> 1.1.10

[samuela]

snappy: fix build on aarch64-darwin

Description of changes

Upgrade snappy. For context, see #219778 and jax-ml/jax#14795.

This commit was co-authored with @uri-canva.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[vcunat]

FYI, this broke x86_64-darwin build:
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/213305017

It's part of PR #221461

[samuela]

Sorry about that @vcunat! I don't have an x86_64-darwin machine to test on so I wasn't aware of this. They're all errors like

/tmp/nix-build-snappy-1.1.10.drv-0/source/snappy.cc:1293:37: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'unsigned long' and 'ptrdiff_t' (aka 'long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
             (op + deferred_length) < op_limit_min_slop);
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/nix-build-snappy-1.1.10.drv-0/source/snappy.cc:1293:37: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'unsigned long' and 'ptrdiff_t' (aka 'long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
             (op + deferred_length) < op_limit_min_slop);
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

so should be pretty easy to fix. Looks related to #219778 (comment).

[samuela]

@vcunat Ok created a fix in samuela@3313572. I can cherry pick onto #221461 if you'd like.

[vcunat]

OK. I would've seen this if only I read this whole thread. Pushed as 2a21328