Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enable slang features unconditionally #598

Conversation

OmarTawfik
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #596

@fvictorio
Copy link
Member

fvictorio commented Sep 16, 2024

With respect to the failing CI, I recommend removing that workflow and using GitHub Projects's native way of automatically adding issues to projects. That can be done in a separate PR though.

@OmarTawfik
Copy link
Contributor Author

With respect to the failing CI, I recommend removing that workflow and using GitHub Projects's native way of automatically adding issues to projects. That can be done in a separate PR though.

I think @kanej added it. I'm happy to remove it if you don't think it is useful anymore?

@OmarTawfik OmarTawfik merged commit d8d3408 into NomicFoundation:development Sep 16, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@OmarTawfik OmarTawfik deleted the enable-slang-features-unconditionally branch September 16, 2024 15:18
OmarTawfik added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
              > With respect to the failing CI, I recommend removing that workflow and using GitHub Projects's native way of automatically adding issues to projects. That can be done in a separate PR though.

I think @kanej added it. I'm happy to remove it if you don't think it is useful anymore?

_Originally posted by @OmarTawfik in #598 (comment)
OmarTawfik added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
OmarTawfik added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
              > With respect to the failing CI, I recommend removing that workflow and using GitHub Projects's native way of automatically adding issues to projects. That can be done in a separate PR though.

I think @kanej added it. I'm happy to remove it if you don't think it is useful anymore?

_Originally posted by @OmarTawfik in #598 (comment)
OmarTawfik added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
> With respect to the failing CI, I recommend removing that workflow and using GitHub Projects's native way of automatically adding issues to projects. That can be done in a separate PR though.

I think @kanej added it. I'm happy to remove it if you don't think it is useful anymore?

_Originally posted by @OmarTawfik in #598 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Symbol are not supported in neovim
2 participants