[AccountDeleter]Adding stubbed definition for missing DI objects.

[ryuyu]

Stubs out a minimal FeatureFlagService (used by PackageService) to allow DI to proceed successfully.

[loic-sharma]

Would it be possible to add a test that verifies the DI container doesn't have issues at runtime?

[zhhyu]

nit: The order of dependencies?

[ryuyu]

Would it be possible to add a test that verifies the DI container doesn't have issues at runtime?

How would i go about doing this? Just have a test that attempts to hydrate the full real objects? That would require a full configuration for test, which I'm not against, but would be more work. Or if there is a simpler way, this sounds like a great idea.

[loic-sharma]

How would i go about doing this? Just have a test that attempts to hydrate the full real objects? That would require a full configuration for test, which I'm not against, but would be more work. Or if there is a simpler way, this sounds like a great idea.

Can you create a test that uses the IServiceProvider to create an instance of ISubscriptionProcessor<AccountDeleteMessage> (similar to this)? You'll likely need to extend account deleter's Job to expose the _serviceProvider.

[ryuyu]

I filed #8700 for adding this test. I had a bit of difficulty immediately. I'll look into pulling it in when possible.