[ADD] Changes to lp:openupgrade-server/8.0 so far (revno. 5147) #1
Conversation
[RFR] Flake8 [FIX] Adapt import location of get_module_path [FIX] Replaced occurrence of 'pool' by 'registry' [FIX] Bogus import openerp.orm
|
Do you want some review on this big MP ? Regards. |
[DEL] Temp file
installed multiple times in the database so no records can be generated for them in the OpenUpgrade analysis phase.
|
This has turned into my working branch over the last couple of days, |
|
BTW I get the feeling I should have forked first as StefanRijnhart/OpenUpgrade.git and then started hacking and requesting a pull as I seem to pollute the branch namespace of this team/project combination. Can someone confirm? |
|
I just discover GitHub so maybe I'll say foolishness but it seem that the When you fork you have the possibility to choose in which "domain" you But again, i'm totally newb on Github. Regards. Sylvain LE GAL
2014-05-26 22:09 GMT+02:00 Stefan Rijnhart notifications@github.com:
|
|
About
it could probably also be a decent occasion to welcome new ideas. Therefore I wanted to throw in: "migration process with graphical tool" in the realm of pentaho kettle. I contacted you, @StefanRijnhart on Mail for an opinion on that idea. So maybe here this opinion could be openly shared? Maybe this is the wrong place to do so, in that case, just shut me down ;) |
|
@biaggacao Like I wrote in my answer email to you, please discuss this on the Community mailing list on Launchpad. It does sound useful but out of scope for OpenUpgrade. |
[ADD] Changes to lp:openupgrade-server/8.0 so far (revno. 5147)
[ADD] Noupdate data changes for base
Otherwise, when loading the logged user would not have access to the `ir.module.module` and this rather technical operation fail. Fixes OCA#1 Closes !1.
Have an inherited view replacing a node in its parent namely: ``` <view name="1"> <world/> <world/> <world/> </view> ``` Inherited by ``` <view name="2" inherit_id="1"> <xpath expr="//world[1]" position="replace"> <world/> </xpath> </view> ``` Before this commit, the resulting xpath branding of the nodes (useful for web_editor, to know where it is supposed to anchor new elements) was incorrect. Note that there is the branding attr data-oe-view_id which specifies in which view they are The 2nd and 3rd world in view #1 were numbered respectively world[1] and world[2] which is incorrect since we *know* those should be world[2] and world[3] (in their own view, i.e. in view #1) This was because when replacing the node, the code lost track of what it replaced and that it attributed the inheriting branding to the replacing nodes After this commit, the 2nd and 3rd world nodes are numbered world[2] and world[3] respectively OPW 2007312 closes odoo/odoo#35134 Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Updating 8.0
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open sales on mobile
2. Click on the search icon (with breadcrumb)
Issue OCA#1:
The displayed cross on the right suggests to users that it's
used to close the facets but it's not.
We replace it by a back arrow to close the search like in other
apps.
3. Click on create 'Create'
4. Select a customer (Without breadcrumb)
Issue OCA#2:
We don't have any breadcrumb inside the control_panel,
so we should always display the search. There is no
need to open/close it.
Task ID: 2200099
closes odoo/odoo#46086
Related: odoo/enterprise#9486
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
[IMP] remove useless test during update
This is injecting the OpenUpgrade-specific changes to a fork of odoo/trunk. I got these as follows:
The last 'proper' commit on lp:openobject-server/trunk is 5218, which corresponds to revision 4f5cc00 of odoo/master. I merged this bzr revision into lp:openupgrade-server/8.0, then took a diff between these corresponding versions of lp:openupgrade-server/8.0 and lp:openobject-server/trunk (using diff openobject-server openupgrade-server -rN --exclude=.bzr -U8 > diff). Then I applied this patch to the git branch and pushed to this location.
Should be a decent starting point.