Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

htp/table: only fetch element when needed #430

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

inashivb
Copy link
Member

It is unnecessary to always fetch the element as it is only needed when there is a match. Get the list item only when the key candidate matches the key parameter and the element needs to be returned. This will ensure lesser calls to htp_list_get fn.

It is unnecessary to always fetch the element as it is only needed when
there is a match. Get the list item only when the key candidate matches
the key parameter and the element needs to be returned. This will ensure
lesser calls to htp_list_get fn.
@inashivb inashivb requested a review from catenacyber August 12, 2024 07:19
@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 22052

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a ticket for this ? A benchmark/profile ?
Should CentOS 7 be replaced with something newer ?

@inashivb
Copy link
Member Author

Is there a ticket for this ?

Nope. Observed this while looking at your report for 7191.

A benchmark/profile ?

None. Just seemed to make logical sense to me. wdyt?

Should CentOS 7 be replaced with something newer ?

Sure. Almalinux? I can only find that we removed CentOS 7 in Suricata, I guess newer versions were already there in the CI there.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

A benchmark/profile ?

None. Just seemed to make logical sense to me. wdyt?

It makes sense.
But I wonder how the effect can be quantified...

Should CentOS 7 be replaced with something newer ?

Sure. Almalinux? I can only find that we removed CentOS 7 in Suricata, I guess newer versions were already there in the CI there.

@jasonish thoughts ?

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 22056

@jasonish
Copy link
Member

@jasonish thoughts ?

I think we should have AlmaLinux 9 at least. Maybe even 8 as well.

@inashivb
Copy link
Member Author

I think we should have AlmaLinux 9 at least. Maybe even 8 as well.

ok. Thank you! Coming up in next rev

@inashivb inashivb closed this Aug 13, 2024
@inashivb inashivb deleted the htp-table-optimizations/v1 branch August 13, 2024 06:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants