Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-number the protocol versions to reflect the "Beta Stage" Try #2 #12

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 19, 2013
Merged

Re-number the protocol versions to reflect the "Beta Stage" Try #2 #12

merged 13 commits into from
Dec 19, 2013

Conversation

DavidAJohnston
Copy link
Contributor

This 2nd try includes grammar fixes and input from J.R. on references to old numbering system

It seems logical to inform new comers that the Mastercoin Protocol is currently in the Beta stage of its development. I propose we can easily accomplish this by simply re-numbering the versions of the protocol (both past and present) to version numbers below that of 1.0
For example version 0.1 version 0.19 and version 0.2 for past versions and 0.3 for the current version. This gives the protocol enough room for growth between now and when it does reach a 1.0 stage of development.

Re-number the protocol versions to reflect the "Beta Stage" of the Mastercoin Specification / Implementations
It seems logical to inform new comers that the Mastercoin Protocol is currently in the Beta stage of its development. I propose we can easily accomplish this by simply re-numbering the versions of the protocol (both past and present) to version numbers below that of 1.0
For example version 0.1 version 0.19 and version 0.2 for past versions and 0.3 for the current version. This gives the protocol enough room for growth between now and when it does reach a 1.0 stage of development.
dacoinminster pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2013
@dacoinminster dacoinminster merged commit 544243c into OmniLayer:master Dec 19, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants