【命名规范问题】PikaServer的TryDBSync函数与实际的功能不匹配，建议修改函数名 #2293
Labels
☢️ Bug
Something isn't working
Comments
chengyu-l
pushed a commit
to chengyu-l/pika
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2024
chengyu-l
pushed a commit
to chengyu-l/pika
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2024
chengyu-l
pushed a commit
to chengyu-l/pika
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2024
bigdaronlee163
pushed a commit
to bigdaronlee163/pika
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2024
…t exist(OpenAtomFoundation#2290, OpenAtomFoundation#2293) (OpenAtomFoundation#2308) Co-authored-by: liuchengyu <liuchengyu@360.cn>
cheniujh
pushed a commit
to cheniujh/pika
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2024
…t exist(OpenAtomFoundation#2290, OpenAtomFoundation#2293) (OpenAtomFoundation#2308) Co-authored-by: liuchengyu <liuchengyu@360.cn>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is this a regression?
Yes
Description
PikaServer的TryDBSync函数主要做的事情是做bgsaveslot，按照主从同步的概念，TryDBSync 容易让人联想到尝试发生DBSync请求（全量同步请求）。
Please provide a link to a minimal reproduction of the bug
No response
Screenshots or videos
No response
Please provide the version you discovered this bug in (check about page for version information)
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: